Quantcast
Channel: Madote
Viewing all 4577 articles
Browse latest View live

The AP apologizes to Eritrea for falsely reporting two Eritrean air force pilots defected to Ethiopia

$
0
0
AP's Elias Meseret Taye's credential was allegedly revoked after falsely reporting two Eritrean air force pilots defected to Ethiopia on October 27, 2016


By CDE

A reporter’s credential is revoked after he falsely reported that two Eritrean pilots defected to Ethiopia with their military jet.

The article in question, from 27 October, was by an Ethiopian freelance journalist, Elias Meseret Taye, working for AP.

In an email to Eritrean embassy in Washington, his employers wrote, “we cherish the trust our readers place in us to provide an accurate and vivid account of the world. On this case, the article was false and created subsequent ill-informed and damaging coverage in other media outlets and across social media.”


Special Rapporteur Sheila Keetharuth Shameless Lie

$
0
0
Mrs. Sheila Keetharuth 


Special Rapporteur Sheila Keetharuth Shameless Lie
By Aghade
Oct 30, 2016

After watching Friday’s bizarre Q&A session with Special Rapporteur Ms. Sheila Keetharuth, I am obliged to call out her deceptive response to an explicit question from the Inner City Press journalist, Mr. Mathew Russel Lee.

For the record, the Q&A session was arranged following Ms. Keetharuth’s presentation to UN Assembly’s 3rd Committee on Thursday. The video posted online shows that the entire Q&A session lasted about 20 minutes with only two (2) journalists in attendance. Lastly, only Mr. Lee of Inner City Press asked her pertinent questions – the most poignant of questions to be exact, enabling us to learn quite a bit about her attitude and understanding towards the role of a Special Rapporteur; economic sanction in relation to human rights; as well as, procedures of fact finding investigation, especially dealing with the views of the so called “other side.”

This short piece focuses on the question she was asked directly as to why she “did not listen” to the views of the “other side”, the thousands of Eritreans in-and-outside of the country who wrote letters, emailed documents, and submitted petitions with over 700 thousand signatures to the commission.

Ms. Keetharuth responded to the question in unambiguous terms that the commission “is open to everyone who would like to engage in a constructive manner” (between 2:55 - 3:00 minutes into the video). Moreover, she stated that she does “encourage contact with the mandate [or her office]” and she always “respond[s], if not personally, somebody does respond on [her] behalf” (between 3:05 - 3:13 minutes into the video).

Ms. Keetharuth claims are false, to say the least. This is because I personally contacted the ‘mandate’ or the commission on Sep. 9, 2016, through their official email address (coieritrea@ohchr.org) and I received an automated reply in no time, stating that the commission’s email account is actually “no longer monitored” (see images 1 and 2). What’s even more bizarre is that the message says they will be “returning” on the last day of 2099. At any rate, my experience was consistent with what others have reported three (3) months earlier.


Image 1: Automated Email Reply from COI on Eritrea (yellow highlight color added for emphasis)


Image 2: Official website of the COI on Eritrea with specific instruction on how to contact them (yellow highlight color added for emphasis)


On Sep. 9, 2016, I emailed a short and simple question to the commission. I wanted to know if the commission was still accepting relevant information from Eritreans, as their website continues to suggest. The response I received was also short and simple: that they are NOT in-fact “open to everyone who would like to engage in constructive manner.”

The Commission’s website is clear as to how one can communicate or send in relevant documents to them – i.e. via the official email. Yet this sole mechanism of communication is not “monitored.” Clearly, Ms. Keetharuth response to Mr. Lee’s important question was a total lie – i.e. the mandate was never open to everyone and thereby the views of hundreds of thousands of Eritreans may have been purged.

My experience of course was just another modest evidence that Ms. Keetharuth never intended to listen to the views of all Eritreans and/or look at the facts related to human rights issues. What a shame!

Q&A with Inner Press: Video >>>

State of Emergency is worsening Ethiopia's human rights crisis

$
0
0
Ethiopia is the only country in the world that's currently being ruled by a 4 member command post



By Felix Horne | HRW

An Ethiopian government directive under a state of emergency contains overly broad and vague provisions that risk triggering a human rights crisis, Human Rights Watch said today in a legal analysis. The government should promptly repeal or revise all elements of the directive that are contrary to international law.

On October 9, 2016, the government announced a six-month state of emergency following the destruction of some government buildings and private property by demonstrators. Over the past year, security forces have killed hundreds of protesters and detained tens of thousands in two regions where there have been numerous protests over government policies.

“Ethiopia’s state of emergency bans nearly all speech that the government disagrees with anywhere in the country for at least six months,” said Felix Horne, senior Africa researcher at Human Rights Watch. “The state of emergency hands the army new sweeping powers to crack down on demonstrators, further limiting the space for peaceful dissent.”

Under the new state of emergency, the army can be deployed country-wide for at least six months. The implementing directive prescribes draconian restrictions on freedom of expression, association, and assembly that go far beyond what is permissible under international law and signal an increased militarized response to the situation. The directive effectively codifies many of the security forces’ abusive tactics that Human Rights Watch has documented since the protests began.

The directive includes far-reaching restrictions on sharing information on social media, watching diaspora television stations, and closing businesses as a gesture of protest, as well as curtailing opposition parties’ ability to communicate with the media. It specifically bans writing or sharing material via any platform that “could create misunderstanding between people or unrest.”

It bans all protests without government permission and permits arrest without court order in “a place assigned by the command post until the end of the state of emergency.” It also permits “rehabilitation” – a euphemism for short-term detention often involving physical punishment. Many of these restrictions are country-wide and not limited to the two of Ethiopia’s nine regions where most of the unrest took place.

Under international law, during a state of emergency a government may only suspend certain rights to the extent permitted by the “exigencies of the situation.” Many of the measures, including the restrictions on freedom of expression, assembly, and association go far beyond what is permitted under international law.

The government reports that since the state of emergency began, 1,600 people have been arrested, including about 50 for closing their businesses. Human Rights Watch also has received unconfirmed reports of unlawful killings, mass arrests, and looting of houses and businesses by the security forces. There have been some armed clashes between security forces and unidentified groups. Mobile phone access to the internet has been blocked since October 5. Addis Standard, a monthly English language magazine and one of the few independent publications left in Ethiopia, announced on October 25 that it was halting publication of its print edition due to state-of-emergency restrictions.

Large-scale, and mainly peaceful anti-government protests have been sweeping through Oromia, Ethiopia’s largest region, since November 2015, and the Amhara region since July 2016. Ethiopian security forces have killed more than 500 people during protests over the last year. These protests occurred in a context of the near-total closure of political space.

Protesters have voiced a variety of concerns, including issues related to development, the lack of political space, the brutality of the security forces, and domination of economic and political affairs by people affiliated with the ruling party. The emergency measures send a strong and chilling message that rather than dealing with expressed grievances and ensuring accountability for violence by both government forces and protesters, the government will continue and probably escalate the militarized response.

On October 2, in Bishoftu, a town 40 kilometers southeast of the capital, Addis Ababa, tensions ignited at the annual Irreecha festival – an important Oromo cultural event that draws millions of people each year. Security forces confronted huge crowds with tear gas and fired shots and scores of people then died during a stampede. Since then, alleged demonstrators have damaged a number of government buildings and private businesses perceived to be close to the ruling party, setting some on fire.

The government has in part blamed human rights groups seeking to document violations of international law for the recent unrest. Human Rights Watch has repeatedly called for an independent and credible investigation into the security force response to the protests and to the deaths in Bishoftu.

“Many of the abuses committed by security forces since November 2015 have now been codified under the state of emergency,” Horne said. “Trying to use the legal cover of a state of emergency as a pretext for the widespread suspension of rights not only violates the government’s international legal obligations, but will exacerbate tensions and long-term grievances, and risks plunging Ethiopia into a greater crisis.”

Eritrea Challenges the COI: The thrill of honesty & The agony of lies. The Sweetness of Victory, the struggle continues.

$
0
0
Eritrean man in Asmara holds a sign that reads: "I stand with Eritrea for my human rights against aggressions, sanctions and defunct Commission of Inquiry report."


Eritrea Challenges the COI: The thrill of honesty & The agony of lies. The Sweetness of Victory, the struggle continues.


No other nation in the world could have withstood the inhumane and illegal behavior of the United Nations towards Eritrea on several occasions. However, with the truth on her side and a united patriotic people, once again Eritrea has proven it is a nation that stands for peace, made for peace, & created by peace. A nation where building food security is a priority and building schools and clinics has been the mantra for the 25 years since it became independent. A nation where the basic human rights of a person are a part and parcel of its way of life. By comparison to many other countries Eritrea’s values and it’s commitment to human rights by far outweigh those nations that claim to be democratic. Considering where it started as a nation and where it is today, the fact remains that Eritrea instead of being accused falsely, should be used as a role model for how other nations can improve on their human rights.

At the core of the problem for Eritrea lies a very unstable and corrupt neighbor in the TPLF lead Ethiopia that has robbed the people of the Horn of Africa region many years of prosperity and development. In order to understand Eritrea, one needs to accept the fact that it was made and built by enshrining the principles of human rights in its DNA during the struggle years. A war zone where its enemies were better treated than its own fighters for the sake of humanity. Its own freedom fighters stood in the face of adversity from the masses by protecting their rivals and taking care of them with dignity. A nation whose sons and daughters gave up their lavish lives like the many accusers sitting at the UN, and decided to fight for their right to exist as a people in this corrupt world we live in. Eritreans are Unique and will forever change the course of feelings for national pride into a new high. While we may have lost the great diplomat in his excellency Ambassador Girma Asmerom, the fight continued. A man of integrity in the otherwise corrupt diplomacy corridors of the UN. He walked the walk and talked the talk. His intellectual capacity far outsmarted those who used the UN to muzzle the voices of the Eritrean people. He also paved the way for the small positive step that we witnessed this week and as a result made it better for an incredibly intelligent, eloquent and brilliant individual in Yemane Gebreab to speak on behalf of Eritrea. It takes lots of patience to take a beating and defend your stance. To quote Sir Winston Churchill, “Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak. It’s also what it takes to sit down and listen.”

Eritrea’s unselfish leaders do all they can to make sure their people don’t suffer anymore. The very accusations of human rights against Eritrea, a nation that strictly adheres to the Universal Periodic Review was being used against it. The unyielding faith in Eritreans has always been balanced with a clear sense of reality and the people spoke in large numbers during demonstrations or through social media. The enemies of Eritrea tried hard to copy the real Eritreans gathering riffraff and even their own minority regime supporters to act and be like the real Eritreans who stand with their Government.

The audacity that the three group COI (Commission on Inquiry) had to interview/document people that are not Eritreans and use it to incriminate Eritrea is a huge blunder and big sin for the cause of human rights. Add to the fact that a document used by a brutal inhumane Derg government of Ethiopia that committed one of the worst crimes against humanity known as “Red Terror” was used as a template to accuse Eritrea of human rights. A shameful act for the United Nations to entertain the idea of allowing such report to be shared shows that the corruption in New York City is out of control and needs an overhaul.

First and foremost let’s ask a layman’s question. What is a Special Rapporteur?

Well let’s try to answer this question. According to sources from the UN, it is a title given to individuals working on behalf of various regional and international organizations who bear specific mandates to investigate, monitor and recommend solutions to specific human rights problems. The three group Commission of Inquiry, by allowing a specific country mandate and having the logistical support from the enemy(TPLF’s Ethiopia) of the country being investigated the COI created a huge hole for themselves and committed their first breach. When entering the refugee camps infested with Tigraian locals with a small sprinkle of Eritreans they broke another rule as they were appointed by the Human Rights Council of the UN, to act independently of governments and as such should have been aware of their responsibility. Their logistical support all had been influenced by the brutal criminal government in Addis which swayed and dictated how they did business.

They claim that they do not receive any financial compensation for their work that can be scrutinized by the public, but they receive personnel and logistical support from criminal human traffickers like Meron Estifanos, Daniel Mekonnen as well as the likes of Selam Kidane, Elsa Chyrum and many others under a hidden wall as well as from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and are often backed by charities and corporations which are loyal to nations like Ethiopia’s minority regime. Organizations like NED (National Endowment for Democracy) utilizing the American Tax payer money continue to bleed the economy of the USA to appease criminals. So indirectly they are getting money but not on paper. If Sheila Keetharuth and Mike Smith and the Ghanian choir boy did not benefit why would they accept such mandates that they know nothing about? Obviously there is something in it. Based on fiction and lies the COI report may have defamed the Character of the Eritrean nation but it has not broken the spirit of the Eritrean people. We are fighters and we do it peacefully, tactically, together and we don’t do it for money but for love of country. Just look no further from the Hallways where we lost our great Diplomat who died fighting for his country. His excellency Ambassador Girma Asmerom and the many others alive and martyred for a nation created based on the principles of human rights. In Conclusion, It is very refreshing to see the presidential advisor to Eritrea, Mr. Yemane Gebreab speak what is on every peace loving Eritrean citizen’s mind.

He eloquently exposed the core problem of our region with one simple sign while he intelligently shared the problems with the fake COI report’s accusations. Its now time to continue the fight through thick and thin. We must help remove the corrupt mandate of the Special Rapporteur who has been dealing with criminal entities to accuse Eritrea of criminal behavior. She must be removed once and for all and we as Eritreans and the majority voices of the people of Eritrea need to stand up to the United Nations and it human rights council. Let’s be aware and smart and understand what truly is going on at the UN. About 10 years ago the United Nations Human Rights Council, which replaced the UN Commission on Human Rights, extended the mandates of all Special Rapporteurs by one year to enable it to conduct a review of the mandates and seek ways of strengthening their roles. However, Special Rapporteurs for countries which did not approve a Special Rapporteurs came under question and the mandates of the Special Rapporteurs for Cuba and Belarus were not renewed. It is time to do the same for Eritrea and send these human rights violators to the curb.

Victory to the masses,

Glory to our martyrs,

Eritrean-American
From the East Coast of the USA.

Ethiopia’s cabinet reshuffle may be too little, too late to quell protests

$
0
0




Ethiopia’s Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn on Tuesday announced a compelled cabinet reshuffle in an effort to contain sustained and stubborn anti-government protests. The changes follow a swift declaration on Oct. 9 of a state of emergency, which has effectively militarized an already authoritarian state.

In its 25 year-long reign, the ruling Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) has never made major political concessions in response to public grievances. In that regard, the replacement of key government ministers and Desalegn’s allies is yet another victory for the protesters. (In January authorities grudgingly withdrew the so-called Addis Ababa master plan which served as the immediate trigger for the Oromo protests.)

However, the tone deaf ministerial shuffle, which was unanimously approved by the country’s single-party parliament, sidesteps the protesters political grievances and it will do very little to quell the uprising. The move can be summed up by a popular Ethiopian idiom: Changing the stove does not make the stew any better.

Analysts have pounced on the elevation of two officials from the Oromo People’s Democratic Organization (OPDO), the junior partners in the shaky EPRDF coalition, namely Workineh Gebeyehu Woldekidan, the new minister of Foreign Affairs, and Negeri Lencho Bultum, the minister of Communication. The promotion of two Afaan Oromo speaking loyalists is indeed notable but it will do little to placate the protesters’ demands.

The calls for equitable distribution of power was never about inadequate representation at the very top in a regime controlled by the Tigrayan People’s Liberation Front (TPLF). Instead, it was a demand for an end to the hegemonic domination of ethnic Tigrayans over the country’s politics, security and economy.

The Foreign Ministry is one of the offices controlled by minority Tigrayans since 1991. Workineh’s appointment ostensibly takes that key sticking point away from the opposition. However, the former federal police chief is himself partly of Tigrayan heritage, which only deepens the lack of trust among majority Oromo. Besides, the debate over Workineh’s ethnic background makes little difference. As former three-time minister Juneydi Saddo told OPride recently, for every non-Tigrayan minister,TPLF often appoints a shadowy but powerful deputy that controls the higher official and runs the office from behind.

Negeri, a former journalism professor at Addis Ababa University, is a relative newcomer to politics. In fact, he has in the past disparaged the state-run Ethiopian Broadcasting Corporation, EBC, as a government mouthpiece. However, his recent writings on developmental journalism and a prominent seat on the boards of EBC and its regional affiliate, Oromia Radio and TV Organization, suggests a clear evolution of thought on the role of journalism in society.

One thing is certain: He will be the first trilingual government mouthpiece to occupy the position. (Negeri speaks Oromo, Amharic and English.) In his first interview with foreign media, Negeri told AFP, the “new cabinet is ready to respond and provide better service.” His comment toys the official line that the public grievances are informed by poor service provision in the regions.

The protesters’ grievances, particularly in Oromia, are informed by decades of systematic exclusion and marginalization. It also calls for an end to impunity for security forces and a heavy-handed government repression; the release of jailed activists and political leaders; respect for the rule of law; genuine self-rule, and democratic opening. Just as the scrapping of the master plan in January did not end the protests, the latest superficial maneuver won’t end the growing popular discontents.

There is no indication that EPRDF is ready to face the music: Two of the country’s largest ethnic groups – the Oromo and Amhara – have resoundingly rejected the regime. Barely a year after ‘winning’ 100 percent of parliamentary seats both at the federal and regional legislatures, EPRDF now faces an absolute and total legitimacy crisis. The new cabinet replacements indicate its promises of ‘deep reform’ are indeed hollow and predictable.

Mobile internet has been shut down for nearly a month now. This has angered an increasingly connected educated youth. The imposition of a wartime-like state of emergency has brought a temporary lull in protests. But the crackdown and arrests continue out of the glare of media publicity. This ensures the hardening of the protesters demands.

This bodes ill for the country’s future. The marital law is already taking a toll on the country’s economy. Inflation is rising. The military has severely curtailed the flow of goods and the movement of people, including civilians, diplomats, journalists and foreign aid workers. The tourism sector has been hard hit as western governments warn their citizens against non-essential travels to the country.

As we approach the first anniversary of the Oromo protests, which began on November 11, 2015, in Ginci town, the youth are thinking of ways to circumvent restrictions — both online and on the streets — to revive the budding protest movement. More than 1,000 Oromo civilians have been killed and tens of thousands have been arrested since the protests began.

When the protesters do return to the streets, they are unlikely to be swayed by the credentials of out-of-touch government ministers with PhDs or the replacement of a few party loyalists at the top of the pyramid.

Ethiopian troops in Somalia refuse to return home

$
0
0
TPLF troops in Somalia refuse to come home

By ESAT

Hundreds of Ethiopian troops in Somalia who have been fighting Al-Shabaab in that country have revolted, with dozens crossing to the Arabian peninsula selling their weapons.

According to ESAT’s military and intelligence sources, the soldiers, who are not with the regular African Mission in Somalia (AMISOM), have not been paid their salaries for three months.

About 70 of the troops have sold their weapons and crossed the sea to the Arabian peninsula, while the rest have refused to join the troops returning home.

The troops, according to the sources, have revolted due to interruptions in their salaries for three months, ethnic favoritism in the Ethiopian army in which Tigrayans commanders act with impunity.

TPLF’s New Ministers Are Puppet’s Made for Television and International Aid.

$
0
0


TPLF’s New Ministers Are Puppet’s Made for Television and International Aid.


Note. 100% Ethiopians plus 2% TPLF amounts to 102%. TPLF never believed it is an Ethiopian and its ultimate goal is to establish “Tigray Republic”.


By Abel Kebedom

Yesterday, we all heard that the Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF), that hails from the 6% Tigreans, has given some power to the 96% non-Tigrean Ethiopians. I call this the never ending TPLF drama. What we should know, for fact, is TPLF started by doing drama and will end doing drama. The reality is there is no way TPLF will share real power with Ethiopians because its nature does not allow it to do so. TPLF thinks it has defeated the 96% non-Tigrean Ethiopians by the barrel of the gun. Hence Ethiopia remains its war turf until Ethiopians get the courage to dispose it through the barrel of the gun. When that happens TPLF’s plan B, to declare Tigray republic under article 39, kicks in.

Few months ago there was an interview on Ethiopian Satellite Television (Ethsat) with a person who was the security guard of the late Ethiopian president Meles Zenawi and later to his prime Minister Tamrat Lyne. Remember Meles and Tamrat Lyne were president and Prime Minister respectively. He said all five hundred employees of Meles Zenwi’s office, including the Janitor, were Tigreans. If you are Amhara or Oroma you are not allowed to work in that office. Imagine, to think a government that harbors such level of distrust and hate to other Ethiopians will share real power with them is nothing but wishful thinking. I doubt, even after the death of Meles, puppet prime minister Desalen Hailemariam was able to change anything in that office. It is not because he does not want to, his job description does not allow him to do that. Hence, recent TPLF’s claim of power sharing is a drama for the following reasons.

1. In the current TPLF’s government, the body controls the head, not the reverse.

Federal government is the instrument that Tigreans heavily rely on to rule the whole Ethiopia. Thus, like Meles’s office all ministries are staffed by Tigreans. When the minister is non-Tigrean, there is a Tigrean vice minister in the office. That tells you the minister is placed to show the international community, up on which TPLF depends for aid, that there are non-Tigreans in the TPLF government. However, the real minster is the Tigrean vice minister. For instance, in the Defense ministry Siraj Fergessa, who is from the Oromo Ethnic Group, is the defense Minister and Tigrean Samora Yonus is the vice minister. However, in realty Samora Yonus is the minister and Siraj Fergessa is the vice minister. Siraj accepts orders from Samora. In fact, in one of the evaluations, SiraJ was criticized of being too scared of Samora. For that matter, because the defense ministry is full of Tigreans, there is no way Siraj could have his own followers inside the ministry. With no followers Siraj is Samora’s puppet made for Television.

2. Security, Police, Defense and Communication are still under full control of TPLF.

When a government wants to oppress its people, the four things it needs is security, police, defense and communications. In the current government all three important government positions are under full control of TPLF. In fact, last week a previous official of the TPLF Spy agency gave a testimony to Ethsat that in the pretext of work force reduction TPLF laid of eleven thousand Telecommunication Employees and replaced them by Tigreans whose sole job is to spy on Ethiopians who are exchanging messages on the phone and social Media. Do not forget that currently TPLF is using all four government institutions to crash the 96% Ethiopian’s opposition to its 6% Apart-tide Minority rule.

3. It is a cover for sharing the blame on TPLF barbaric act against Ethiopians.

If you are adult enough to remember, few weeks before Mengistu fled to Zimbamwe he presented a cabinet of Ministers who were very diverse and most of them out of the Military Junta. The objective was to wash Mengistu’s seventeen years of crimes by the new faces. What TPLF is currently doing is the same. The massacre, arrest and subjugation of Ethiopians led by Samora Yonus, Getachew Assefa and Debetsion Gebremicael is going to continue until TPLF is thrown out of power. Till then the new non Tigrean ministers will be ordered to apologize for the TPLF crimes by appearing on TV Screen. You will not see Samora , Getachew or Debetsion apologizing for it. Instead they are going to send their puppets who are made for Television.

4. The Tigrean ex-ministers will stay around.

Even though they are not in government structure any more, why do you continue to see Sium Mesfin, Sibhat Nega, Abai Tsehaie and Bereket Simon representing the government in very important meeting. That tells you that there is a secret party that orders prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn what to do. TPLF does not need power sharing. It wants puppets who give the international community the impression that TPLF is ceding power to non-Tigreans. Because most of the Ethiopian budget comes from Aid, TPLF needs to do that Drama for its survival.

Over all, the current TPLF drama is similar to the 2005 election. The 2005 election drama was made not to give power to non-Tigrean Ethiopians but to mislead the International community to believe that Ethiopia was holding a multiparty election. Fortunately, the sham election did not end that way. When the opposition parties won the majority of the vote, TPLF resorted to vote stealing. When Ethiopians opposed TPLF’s Vote stealing activities Meles Zenawi declared the security, police, defense and off course Telecommunications were under his control. Accordingly, he killed more than 200 people and arrested 50,000 to crash the opposition. Later the opposition groups that won the election were sent to prison. That is why the long defeated TPLF is still holding power in Ethiopia.

Therefore, it is important for every Ethiopian to learn from History. That is current TPLF’s power sharing fanfare is nothing but a drama of puppets made for television and International aid.

[Video] Somalia: The Forgotten Story (Part 2)

$
0
0



By Aljazeera

The ongoing civil war has caused serious damage to Somalia's infrastructure and economy. Thousands of Somalis have either left as economic migrants or fled as refugees. Most spent months, if not years, in refugee camps aboard. Around 200,000 Somalis refugees have fled to Yemen and roughly 50,000 to the UAE. There are around 150,000 Somalis living in Canada, 100,000 in the UK and 85,000 in the US.

Within Somali, more than a million people are internally displaced.

"There are more than 1.1 million people displaced from their homes and their original places of living. 1.1 million people. There's certainly nearly that same number who are reliant upon food assistance from the United Nations agency and other donors, nearly a million people who can't meet their own food needs," says Nicholas Kay, United Nations special representative for Somalia.

Somalia receives aid from both the UN and the Arab League - of which it is a member - how it's allocated and where it goes can sometimes appear inconsistent.

Many Somalis have sought refuge in neighbouring countries, hoping to return to Somalia once the civil war dies down. Ethiopia has become home to 4.6 million Somalis and Kenya to over 2 million. After a series of Al-Shabaab attacks in Kenya starting in 2011, the Kenyan government began ordering Somalis back into refugee camps and some to return to Somalia.

Other Somalis have even fled to war-torn Libya, a hub for human traffickers who export them to the full. From there, they must make the often treacherous sea journey to Europe and then by land to onward destinations. Those who survive can encounter a wide range of problems - but sometimes find help from established Somali communities.

With the collapse of government, Somalis have often turned to their tribes, clans and sub-clans to fill the void, and clan allegiances can extend beyond Somalia, Ethiopia and Kenya into the diaspora. "The clan is a wonderful form of insurance," says the BBC's Africa Editor, Mary Harper. "Because if I arrive in London and I'm from a particular Somali clan, I'll find my Somali clan brothers and sisters and they'll look after me. If I don’t have any money, they'll give me money to maybe start a business and maybe I’ll pay it back. If I don’t have anywhere to live, they'll help me find somewhere to live. So they really, really look after each other."

"The Somali community in the UK has been in existence long before the state collapsed," says Laura Hammond, Senior Lecturer in Development Studies at SOAS, the School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London. "As a community the Somali community is suffering quite a lot from a lack of integration which is caused not just by their own difficulties, learning the language or figuring out so-called British life. But it’s also about structural exclusions that are put in place. So it’s very difficult for them to find jobs, it's very difficult for them to solve their immigration status. It can take them years to actually gain citizenship."

Abdi Warsame and Abdirizak Bihi are part of the Somali community in Minneapolis in Minnesota state in the US. Warsame has become an elected member of Minneapolis City Council and has worked hard to ensure that his people are properly and evenly represented at the municipal level. Bihi runs the Somali Education Advocacy Center: "In 1996 I moved here from Washington DC to work with the refugees I’ve seen in camps. So I knew the challenges they’ll face here. I became an interpreter, a counselor, a cultural broker. We’d train them to or help get Somali speaking personnel so they could address the issues that the new Americans were facing. And it’s not really easy to be black, Muslim and immigrant."

When Aboukar Awale came to the UK in 1997, he found mafrishes, cafes where Somali men would drink tea and chew the addictive stimulant khat. He himself became an addict - but the drug is now banned in the UK, thanks to the campaign spearheaded by Awale. However, it's still a big problem among young Somalis and so he's now taken his campaign to the streets of Somalia itself: "I thought if I am lucky, then what about the children of Somalia, and those being raised who think khat is a good thing? And that's how I started this campaign."

Like many Somalis across the diaspora, Awale hopes deeply that one day he’ll be able to return to help re-build his homeland: "It will happen inshallah. It might not happen in ten years; it might not happen in maybe 20 years. But one day… It just breaks my heart. But inshallah, Somalia will come back. Someday Somalia will be back."


Jawar Mohammed believes Ethiopian regime wants him dead

$
0
0
Oromia Media Network executive Jawar Mohammed


By Ludovica Iaccino | IBtimes

Jawar Mohammed, political analyst and executive director of the Oromia Media Network (OMN), believes the Ethiopian government would kill him, should he return to his homeland.

Mohammed,30, is an ethnic Oromo. He grew up in Dhummuga, a small town located in Oromia, Ethiopia's largest state. During his childhood, Mohammed went to school in Asela and Adama and left his homeland in 2003 on a schoolarship to study in Singapore.

He later moved to the US to study political science at Stanford University and Human Rights at the Columbia.

"I came here as a student, not as a refugee. But right now, I am probably the most wanted person by the Ethiopian government and I think the government is willing to kill me if they have a chance," Mohammed, who is based in Minneapolis, alleged during a phone interview with IBTimes UK.

"Every time I appear on television, for the last few months, the government is all over the place condemning me and calling me a terrorist, an agitator and an enemy of the state."

Oromo people 'are making history'

In October, Ethiopia declared a six-month-long state of emergency following unrest in Oromia, and occasionally in Amhara.

The response to the protests, labelled as the biggest anti-government unrest Ethiopia has witnessed in recent history, has resulted in the death of more than 500 people since November 2015, a figure the government later confirmed.

In Oromia, people demonstrated against perceived disenfranchisement and lack of inclusion in the political process as the government is dominated by the Tigray minority. They also called for an end to land grabbing, claiming Oromo farmers are forcibly evicted from their farms.

Mohammed is a strong supporter of the protests as he believes Ethiopia "needs a regime change and the installation of a government elected by the people."

"Oromo people are making history, they have been fighting for freedom, dignity and self-determination for almost 50 years now. In the last couple of years they struggled intensified, has become more strategic, coordinated and unified, it has weakened the government and has inspired other people in Ethiopia and the region," he said.

Under the state of emergency, Ethiopia banned certain media outlets, including OMN.

"The government believes OMN and social media, Facebook particularly, are used to mobilise, agitate, coordinate people. The government sees this as a way to undermine their control over the population," Mohammed claimed.

Mohammed believes it is too dangerous for him to go to Ethiopia right now. However, he said he is planning to return. "Going back is not an potion at the moment, but in the future, I will return and fight with my people."

Government's position

When contacted by IBTimes UK for comments on the allegations, a spokesperson for the Ethiopian embassy in London dismissed Mohammed's claims as "unsubstantiated information".

The diplomat also alleged Mohammed and other members of the diaspora community could have links to the Oromo Liberation Front, which the Ethiopian government labelled as a terrorist organisation that carried out violent acts in Ethiopia, Somalia and Kenya.

Created in 1973, OLF stemmed from the discontent among people over a perceived marginalisation by the government and to fight the hegemony of the Amhara people.

OLF – still active today – calls for the self-determination of the Oromo people. The group has always denied allegations of violence , claiming its mission is to terminate "a century of oppression" against the Oromos.

All Naked Lies Exposed. It Is Time to Lift the UNJUST Sanction on Eritrea

$
0
0
It's long over due to remove the illegal and UNjust sanctions on Eritrea.


All Naked Lies Exposed. It Is Time to Lift the UNJUST Sanction


It was during the time when the distorted American policy towards the horn of Africa forging unhealthy short sited strategy with the minority regime of Ethiopia (TPLF), to arm twist Eritreans and bow to the orders that come from Washington and accept the pseudo anchor state administration on behalf of the western interests.

When the Eritrean leadership resisted accepting neo-colonization, they thought Ethiopia will easily destroy the gallant Eritrean people aspiration to live free; under the guise of border issue they ignited unwanted and destructive war. The fact that “Badme” the focal point ruled out by the court of law to be Eritrean Sovereign Land affirms Eritrea always was on the right.

Unlike their desire and expectations, although too late however, they were able to learn that Eritreans are rock solidly united to defend their home land. The war severely failed. A confirmation presenting a second lesson: to learn after the hard fought independence war.

Hence they were unable to get what they were hoping through the barrel of gun, they twisted their strategy in a highly sophisticated with immense investment in human, financial and diplomatic attack against Eritrea.

Among many systemic methods, the bold attack was to taint Eritrea as a nation that helps terrorists, spoiler, undemocratic, African N. Korea, you name it was the precursor for hand cuffing, and isolating the government and the people.

To fulfill their wishes, they fabricated none existing and unverifiable deceits, Eritrea become a victim for the second time at the UNSC this time though “Unjust Sanction”.

Reason provided for the sanction as stated below was “arming training and equipping Al-Shabab of Somalia and later on added the Djibouti border issue. The following was the core point from the UNSC record:

Resolution 1907 (2009) Stipulates Arms Embargo, Travel Restrictions, Asset Freezes:

“The Council demanded that all States, in particular Eritrea, cease arming, training and equipping armed groups and their members, including Al-Shabaab, which aimed to destabilize the region or incite violence and civil strife in Djibouti. It further demanded that Eritrea cease facilitating travel and other forms of financial support to individuals or entities designated by the Committee established pursuant to resolution 751 (1992) regarding Somalia and other sanctions committees, in particular the Committee established pursuant to resolution 1267 (1999) regarding Al-Qaida and the Taliban.”

The fact that the Monitoring Group found no evidence that Eritrea was supporting Al-Shabab on their report to the UNSC, it should have lifted the UNJUST sanctions.

Recently, Qatari government reported that it has taken full responsibility to resolve the case of Eritrea Djibouti border and a “fair and peaceful settlement has been achieved”

Now that all the lies have been clearly verified to be a fabrication to harm Eritrea the Embargo against must be lifted immediately.

With these the ill-advised architects, to have learned a lesson from Eritrea, be it the 1st betrayal by the UN against the will of Eritrean citizen annexing Eritrea to Ethiopia, or the current, placing UNJUST sanction, it is always the will of the people and the truth prevails.


Ibrahim A. Ibrahim


[Video] Eritrea's official statement at UNGA on COI after defeating Ethiopia, Djibouti draft resolution

$
0
0



Video: Eritrea's official statement by Zebib Berhane at UNGA on COI after defeating Ethiopia, Djibouti draft resolution

The following information was translated from German to English using online software:

A last attempt to suppress Eritrea by abuse of human rights regulations was shattered by the United Nations.

A draft resolution, proposed by the worst violators of human rights, namely Ethiopia and its puppet State Djibouti was rejected by the Third Committee of the General Assembly and besigt, once and for all! End of (finito here is the same thing)

A four-year project, which aimed to destabilize Eritrea and reverse its hard-earned independence, while they wanted to cover up their crimes of human rights, has now come to an end.

Now we will redouble our efforts to help Sheila, the Rapporteur, to relax, and call for scrap of state-specific mandate.

It was also found:

"The Americans have now submitted satellite images of the border fight that took place in June by Ethiopia. They also have presented satellite images of Ethiopia pulling its troops from Somalia. Everybody sees this as a concrete preparation of an invasion of Eritrea. So do the EU ambassadors. That's very, very bad!"

But stay tuned and keep a watchful eye.




Ethiopian rebel commander criticizes U.S. support for regime

$
0
0
Prof. Berhanu Nega



“We’re not going to sit down and die.”

By GlobalJournalist

Ethiopian rebel leader Berhanu Nega has tried democratic politics before. Now the former Bucknell University professor and one-time mayor-elect of Ethiopia’s largest city is trying to topple his home-country’s repressive government through the barrel of a gun – all in the name of democracy.

To do so he’s allied his Ethiopian rebel group, Ginbot-7, with the government of neighboring Eritrea – a country often referred to as “the North Korea of Africa” and labeled by Human Rights Watch as a “giant prison” for its widespread use of forced labor and government conscription.

But back in 2005 Berhanu was a leader of the Coalition for Unity and Democracy, a new opposition alliance that was challenging the ruling Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) in what promised to be the East African nation’s first democratic elections. The EPRDF itself had taken power as a rebel group that helped topple the country’s former Communist regime in 1991. For its first 14 years in power, it had run the country as a virtual one-party state, but now it was allowing a broad-based opposition to challenge it in national elections.

On election day, support for opposition was much stronger than expected. The CUD won the capital Addis Ababa overwhelmingly, and Berhanu was chosen as mayor. But the EPRDF claimed a majority in the national parliament – a result the opposition disputed. Over a series of tense weeks of negotiations, opposition demonstrators were met by security forces firing live ammunition. Berhanu and other opposition leaders were jailed on charges including treason and genocide.

After 21 months in prison, Berhanu was released and returned to Pennsylvania to teach economics at Bucknell. He also began raising money for a new Ethiopian opposition group, Ginbot-7, which sought to overthrow the Ethiopian government by any means. Ethiopia’s government declared Ginbot-7 a terrorist group and sentenced him to death in absentia. Last year, Berhanu left Bucknell and moved to Eritrea, a country that fought a bloody border war with Ethiopia from 1998-2000.

With Ethiopia declaring a state of emergency last month amid widespread anti-government protests that have left hundreds dead, Berhanu spoke from Eritrea with Global Journalist’s Bryce Arthur about Ginbot-7’s plans, the U.S.’s close alliance with the Ethiopian government and his reasons for allying with Eritrean dictator Isaias Afewerki. What follows is an edited version of their exchange.

Global Journalist: What is the biggest problem with the Ethiopian government?

Berhanu Nega: I believe that the Ethiopian government is one of the most brutal dictatorships in the continent. It’s a regime that has divided the country along ethnic lines, trying to take advantage of fissures between different ethnic communities so it can divide and conquer. It’s also led by a small minority group who really do not take into account the rights of the majority of the population.

Global Journalist: Do you see yourself as a political figure or as a rebel fighter?

Berhanu: The opposition to the government is political. Ginbot-7 was established in 2008, after the 2005 election was totally stolen, and since then it has taken a position to use whatever mechanism necessary to ensure democracy in the country. That includes peaceful protest and the establishment of self-defense units to defend against the brutality of the regime. We employ diverse methods.

Our main objective is political, we are not interested in armed struggle as such. If this problem can be solved peacefully tomorrow, that’s all we want. However, what we see are people being killed, and thousands being imprisoned. We tried to establish targets for peaceful transition, but when all failed, people don’t have any other options.

You have to understand, this has been going on for 25 years. People have been trying to see if there is any possibility for peaceful transition, and after 25 years, people just simply gave up. The only thing people are getting is increased brutality on the part of the regime, so they start to say “We’re not going to sit down and die for asking for the most basic rights afforded by the constitution.”

GJ: Ethiopia has close relations with the West. Eritrea is under U.N. sanctions. What about the international interests in your conflict?

Berhanu: The West in particular seems to treat this rather brutal [Ethiopian] regime as an ally, especially in the war against terror. In Somalia they have Al-Shabaab, and the Ethiopian regime has been sending troops to deal with that organization. This, I suppose, was seen as good governance by the West and so the West has has been footing the bill for that action for a very long time.

[Ethiopia’s] opposition has been calling for the international community to rein in [the Ethiopian government’s] brutality and to be on the side of the people people as opposed to the side of the regime. The West, in its wisdom, has chosen to fight terror with regimes that terrorize their own people.

Of course, when people are terrorized they revolt at some point, and that’s what we are seeing. The opposition is still hoping the international community will see what is actually happening in the country. Unfortunately up until now, the West has chosen to shore up the regime in the name of its war on terror.

GJ: What about the U.S.? President Obama once referred to the Ethiopian government as “democratically-elected.”

Berhanu: The United States has been the [primary] diplomatic supporter of this regime. When Obama came to Addis Ababa and made that unfortunate statement, it transmitted to the Ethiopian people “you shouldn’t expect anything from the international community. If you want freedom, you will have to fight for it.” It transmitted that there is no international community that will come to support democracy, it is something you will have to do on your own.

GJ: Eritrea itself has considerable problems. Would you say that your association with that government delegitimizes your operation?

Berhanu: In the first place, Ginbot-7 operates within Ethiopia and several other countries, as well as in Eritrea. But to come to your basic question – does the struggle for democracy get tainted when it associates with undemocratic regimes – my view is that when you are an underdog, you get support from where you can get it.

If one’s cause is measured by the supporters it has, I don’t know how you can call the United States democratic. It has friends all over the world that are brutal dictatorships. The nature of a movement should be decided by its own principles.

We would love to get support and aid from the West but we have no particular choice in these terms.

GJ: Were Ethiopia to become democratic, would you seek office?

Berhanu: I think that whoever comes in power is a very, very secondary issue. I really think that once people have the chance to choose their own leaders, and once all the institutions of a democracy are in place, then who actually comes into power is insignificant.

If you are asking me my personal interest, I honestly have no interest in anything other than seeing the country becoming democratic. Whoever is elected, as long as it is done democratically, is fine by me.


Correcting A Distorted Narrative on Eritrea

$
0
0
Asmara, Eritrea


Correcting A Distorted Narrative

Regrettably, New African's article on "Eritrea-Ethiopia Tensions" (July 2016), uncritically relied on two Africa "experts" for its perspectives on Eritrea. Both are avowed Eritrea detractors who haven't been in Eritrea for almost two decades. Consequently, the narrative projected was replete with a litany of factual errors, bias and inherently flawed analysis.

The author even indulges, taking his cue from Dan Connell, in unprofessional and libellous invective on the person of the President. Connell is no ordinary journalist. He is a self-professed agitator for "regime change" in Eritrea, a known operative - "an embedded mole and foot soldier" - doing the bidding of higher powers. He distorts Eritrea's reality to rally support for his zealous "liberating mission" - another "white man's burden", so to speak.

The oversight isn't limited to lack of full disclosures of the informants' motives. Ethiopia's unprovoked aggression against Eritrea last June is depicted as merely another episode in perennial "border dispute". Both countries agreed to settle their "border dispute" through international court adjudicated "final and binding" arbitration. Eritrea accepted the ruling. But Ethiopia's decision to renege on its treaty obligations has and continues to stoke tension. This, however, doesn't diminish the legality and fiality of the settlement. 

Ethiopia's attack in June had nothing to do with the putative "border dispute". Ethiopia's regime doesn't deny this indelible fact either. Its confused and contradictory press statements dithered from blanket denial to belated rationalisation of its unlawful act as a "response to subversive proxy activities". Besides distracting from Ethiopia's obvious internal quandaries, the attack was intended to advance other hostile agendas. 

Furthermore, among numerous errors and misconceptions, the author states: the "international community has always viewed Eritrea's existence with disdain". This sweeping generalisation s grossly inaccurate.

True, Washington has persistently opposed Eritrea's legitimate national rights at every historic juncture. Successive US administrations supported and armed Ethiopia's wars against Eritrea. Post-9/11, with Ethiopia christened an "anchor" state, an ally in crusade against terror, misguided US policies resurfaced. Washington has gone to extreme lengths to provide diplomatic support for Ethiopia's refusal to abide by the ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration. 

Influential though the US may be, a bellwether of international behaviour it isn't. Eritrea enjoys normative diplomatic and economic cooperation with all other major powers, countries and multilateral institutions: including UN agencies, the AfDB and the AU. For instance, this year Eritrea and the EU signed a €220m agreement slated for energy development. Foreign investment, particularly in extractive-industry, remains high with numerous multinational companies participating. 

To portray Eritrea as "an isolated, hermit kingdom" is thus a deliberate distortion peddled mostly by US-funded outfits. As one "Western embassy" in Eritrea emphasised to a Danish Fact Finding Mission: "Eritrea has fallen victim to a massive propaganda campaign from other countries, especially Ethiopia and its allies...Human rights reports from international NGOs either lack knowledge of Eritrea or they are part of the propaganda against the country."

These detractors deliberately maintain that Eritrea's "self-reliance" policy is isolationist. The policy champions an independent political line. Economically it mobilises one's own resources and internal capacities for development. It aims to develop self-confidence that leads to an unswerving commitment to stand on one's own feet rather than be subjected to the denigration that comes with aid-dependency and its crippling conditionality. Assistance is acceptable provided equal partnership is consented to. As attested to by independent observers, the policy isn't without its success. 

Eritrea is one of a few African countries to meet most of its UN Millennium Development Goals by achieving considerable success in health and education, without donor aid.

Within this milieu, some are mobilised to distort this remarkable African experiment. Eritrea's achievements in the face of sustained hostilities aren't inconsequential to the repertoire of African experiences. To parse its lessons requires a sincere, contextualised examination. Context is everything!

H.E. Estifanos Habtemariam, Eritrean Ambassador, UK  & Eire


Ethiopia: Illegitimate Regime Imposes New Parliament

$
0
0
TPLF thinks making cosmetic changes of its cabinet will buy it more political time as the Ethiopian people continue to demand nothing short of regime change. 


By Amanuel Biedemariam

In May of 2005, the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) EPRDF regime conducted a national election and the people of Ethiopia voted to oust the late tyrant Meles Zenawi and his EPRDF TPLF party overwhelmingly.

Meles Zenawi and his TPLF EPRDF cronies did not envision the outcome. Addis Ababa saw the largest demonstration ever. The newly formed party Coalition for Unity and Democracy (CUD) posed immediate threat to the ruling party. Hence, without hesitation and fear of repercussion, Meles did what he does best; jail and kill the leaders of the opposition en-masse.

Meles Zenawi’s response was swift-brutality executed with determination and without hesitation. Ethiopian security forces killed 193 demonstrators and over 30,000 Ethiopians were detained. Subsequently, in November of the same year, live gunfire was directed at innocent demonstrators where over 60,000 protesters and the coalition leaders were arrested.

Right then the TPLF EPRDF regime of Meles Zenawi lost its legitimacy in the eyes of the people of Ethiopia. Ethiopians in the Diaspora took to the streets all around the world and protested condemning the barbaric actions of the TPLF regime. Ethiopians believed that the heinous crimes committed by the regime was worthy of international attention and appealed to the leaders of the US, UK and others.

In July of 2005, two months after the bloody sham election, George Bush and Tony Blair assembled a group of African leaders as key figures to represent Africa’s interest in the G8 gathering in Gleneagles England. Meles Zenawi was one of the leaders that represented Africa to the dismay of Ethiopians that demonstrated against his presence.

To funnel funds, reducing poverty in Africa became the new rallying cry and Meles Zenawi was selected as a de facto spokesperson for the new “Make Poverty History” campaign George Bush and Tony Blair pushed.

In September of 2005, Meles Zenawi was a star in a star-studded Clinton Foundation event that paraded him as a savior of Africa. Meles was in CNN with many high-profile leaders and stars, and he was celebrated as if he liberated Africa. The tyrant gloated while Ethiopians were boiling.

In December of 2006, Meles invaded Somalia and became indispensable partner on the war on terror. Meles was highly valued mercenary that the US and EU exploited in their quest to dominate Africa. They sold him as a pragmatic, articulate, progressive and development oriented African leader that could do no wrong.

Fast forward to 2015, President Barack Obama and his top national security aid Susan Rice reveled in the 100% election victory and rewarded the regime led by the puppet prime minister Hailemariam Desalegn by a visit to Ethiopia making Obama the first sitting American President to visit Ethiopia.

Not to be outdone, German Chancellor Angela Merkel visited Ethiopia while the country is embroiled with uprising-on-fire and when the regime is essentially at war against the people. And said,

“Germany has offered to train Ethiopia's police to deal with the sometimes-deadly demonstrations.”

This is a pattern and a dance that western powers play and have played for long. This is an illegitimate regime at war against the people of Ethiopia being legitimized by Washington and allies so they can keep pushing their agenda through it. This mercenary regime is vital to their Africa agenda and its ouster can destroy their agendas completely. This is a prototype mercenary regime willing to do anything western powers want in South Sudan, Somalia, Eritrea or anywhere.

The minority regime in Ethiopia knows this well and thus the regime has never been accountable to the people of Ethiopia and the region. This means the regime and western powers are joined at the hip. It also means that Ethiopians struggling against the regime must include this reality in their calculus.

Intractable Situation

The reality in Ethiopia is grim. For those who follow the developments closely, it is extremely difficult to predict what the future of Ethiopia will look like. It is also extremely difficult to piece together all the moving parts and make sense of it. However, one thing is very clear, and that is, the current situation in Ethiopia is unsustainable. Here are some reasons why:

Economy:

  • The tourism industry in Ethiopia is damaged and in complete holt. Regardless of how the regime tries to spin the situation, tourism is done for good at least until this regime is in power because the instability in the country is clear for the world to see.
  • Investments in Ethiopia are no longer viable for international investors. Foreign investments in various parts of Ethiopia have become targets and thus, fair game for destruction because these investments benefited the regime and not the people. Foreign investors have lost hundreds of millions of dollars after demonstrators torched them to the ground.
  • The economic infrastructure in the nation is broken because most of the key segments of the economy are under siege since they are owned by the minority clique running the country. Trucks loaded with goods are stopped and destroyed. Road blocks are everywhere making transportation of goods without military escort impossible.
  • Under the state of emergency lockdown, open communication has become a threat to the regime’s survival. Communication is vital for commerce and the regime has literally banned all communication.
  • The people of Ethiopia have decided to not engage in commercial activities. They have been demonstrating by closing their stores. These campaigns are designed to impact the economy.
  • Ethiopia cannot afford to pay its troops under the current state of the country’s economy. With the economy under duress, hard currency is hard to get. Western donations that have sustained the corrupt regime thus far will no longer be able to afford to support the fight against the ever-growing internal armed struggles, growing resistance against federal police in the country and huge number of Ethiopian troops occupying Eritrean territories to mention some whilst spending huge sums of money in South Sudan, Somalia and other places.


Security:
The simplest way to measure the volatility of the situation in Ethiopia is to look at the developments of Northern Ethiopia.

The Tigray Manifesto clearly states that the number one enemy for the people of Tigray are the Amhara.

The Amhara’s in turn accuse the TPLF for taking their land, for forcing millions out of their lands, ethnic cleansing, mass imprisonment of youth, deliberate rape, torture and mass killing.

Per various accounts, the Amhara people are living in exile just like Palestinians in their own country. The Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) has taken their land and made it part of Tigray. This aggressive move can only lead to disastrous escalation that will impact the future of the two regions and by extension the country. Thus, the Amhara people are waging armed struggle while the TPLF is showing no sign of compromise. Instead, the TPLF is instigating ethnic hate by scaremongering, telling the people of Tigray, the Amhara and Oromo are ganging to kill you.

Furthermore, the Oromo people have been resisting the TPLF for a long time. The demonstrations that erupted throughout the country started in Oromia. Yet, the TPLF is defiant and determined not to bring a lasting solution. To make matters worse, the TPLF is unable and incapable to bring solution because resolving the Oromo question will mean the end of TPLF as the Oromo constitute majority in Ethiopia.

Additionally, the minority regime has failed to foster friendly relation with any ethnic region in the country. To the contrary, it has killed, created havoc, committed genocidal acts, mass killings in Ogaden, Gambella and all over Ethiopia.

The above-mentioned complications pose major challenges and the solutions are not readily visible. Worse yet, the TPLF is making the situation worse by imposing draconian measures that will escalate the instability.

The latest reshuffle of the cabinet members exposes the deadly nature of the group, their unwillingness to see the reality on the ground and bring a viable solution to stabilize the country. When the people are asking for fundamental and complete overhaul, the TPLF reshuffled itself and told the world and Ethiopia here is the reform we are willing to give.

This is just part of a trend that is pushing the country to the brink. How can a government that just won 100% of the electorate give a decree of “State of Emergency” and reshuffle itself soon thereafter?

Conclusion
Today Ethiopia is moving in different directions fast. Ultimately, the solution must come from Ethiopians however, it will not be easy or smooth. It may even be bloody.

Ethiopia, over the past seventy years was governed by leaders that were subservient to the interests of superpowers that undermined the interests of the masses. It was led by a monarch, a military dictator and ethnic minority imposing its will on the majority for decades. The uprisal is a result of decades of poor governance and ethnic mistreatment that boiled over.

Ethiopia has been subservient to the needs of US, EU, China, Russia and others. The African Union that is sitting and witnessing the horror in silence is also a reason why Ethiopia’s woes will not get international attention.

That said, for the first time in their history, Ethiopians have a window of opportunity to start fresh and become independent nation free to make their own choices.

Awetnayu@hotmail.com

Investors shy away from Ethiopia in the wake of violent protests

$
0
0
People pass a cargo truck that protesters destroyed in the town of Sebeta last month. The town was one of many where anti-government groups targeted foreign- or state-owned enterprises. (Zacharias Abubeker/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESS VIA GETTY IMAGES)



By Paul Schemm | Washington Post

The smell of rotting mango and passion fruit still hung in the air over the blackened shell of a juice factory near this village more than two weeks after the plant was looted and burned by an aggrieved mob.

As employees swept out the empty rooms, Abraham Negusay, AfricaJuice’s production manager, worked on his laptop in the former lab.

“We are evaluating the damage and destruction, cleaning up the factory and doing a cost analysis,” he said, noting that the Dutch company had yet to decide whether to keep its multimillion-dollar investment in Ethiopia.

The assailants, estimated by ­AfricaJuice farm managers to number in the thousands, descended on the factory in the Upper Awash Valley, about 90 miles southeast of Addis Ababa, on Oct. 4. Wielding axes, spears and some firearms, they overwhelmed the armed guards while workers fled into the nearby forest.

The attack was part of a week-long spasm of violence that followed a deadly stampede on Oct. 2 during Irreecha, a thanksgiving festival held annually by the ­Oromo, Ethiopia’s largest ethnic group. That day in the town of Bishoftu, police fired tear gas into crowds chanting anti-government slogans, and in the ensuing panic, dozens died. The opposition put the death toll in the hundreds.

In response, mobs attacked industrial farms and factories across the country, focusing on those with state ties or owned by foreigners. Several tourist lodges were also targeted, and at least two were destroyed.

Once held up as the hot, new investment destination in Africa because of its cheap labor, plentiful water and stability, Ethiopia’s industrialization program is at risk of faltering — along with its impressive economic trajectory — as current investors reconsider their options and new ones shy away.

The unrest has shown the limits of the authoritarian nation’s ­Chinese-style development plan, which favors growth over public accountability.

A largely agricultural economy, Ethiopia has been luring foreign investors for the past decade to set up light industries, such as textile companies, and agribusiness ventures, such as flower farms.

Foreign investment has increased tenfold, from $265 million in 2005 to $2.16 billion in 2015, according to the World Bank, and the country has surpassed Kenya as East Africa’s largest economy.



The unrest started last year here in Oromia, in central Ethi­o­pia, when some residents began protesting the expropriation of land for foreign industries, as well as poor local administration and their ethnic group’s historic marginalization. It quickly spread to the northern Amhara region, and there were sporadic attacks on farms and factories.

After the Irreecha stampede, activists abroad called for five “days of rage” and systematic ­attacks on foreign and state enterprises.

The government responded to the violence by declaring a state of emergency on Oct. 8. Thousands were arrested, and bans were imposed on protesting, inciting others to demonstrate, damaging public property and communicating with terrorist groups — including listening to anti-government media outlets based abroad.

The measures have prompted concern from the United Nations, Germany and the United States .

Ethiopian officials say the state of emergency was the only way to restore order in the country.

“We have been able to arrest the rate at which the destruction was visited on our people, and the violence has been controlled,” then-government spokesman Getachew Reda said last week. He was replaced in a government reshuffle Tuesday.

An army unit is camped out in front of AfricaJuice, and machine-gun-mounted pickup trucks circle the lush Awash Valley.

President Mulatu Teshome has also toured devastated factories and promised investors that the government will help them recoup their losses.

Interviews with elders and the bystanders to the attacks in the Oromo region made clear that the deaths at the Irreecha festival left people all across the country desperate to vent long-simmering ­anger over land acquisitions for foreign industry. AfricaJuice was reportedly involved in one such land dispute.

In a few cases, though, investors’ ties to a particular community may have saved their farms. Marc Driessen, a Dutch flower grower, recalled watching smoke billowing into the sky as the ­AfricaJuice factory burned just six miles from his own 12-year-old farm, Maranque Plants.

“It was really an end-of-the-world kind of thing,” he said.

Inside the vast greenhouses, hundreds of workers — mostly from nearby Alaga Dore — tended the delicate chrysanthemums, dahlias and poinsettias that would later be packed up and shipped to 35 countries.

As hundreds of angry young men and women approached the main gate on Oct. 4, Driessen and his managers feared the worst — until the village elders intervened.

“We went on motorbikes,” elder Shumi Telila recalled as he sat under a tree in Alaga Dore. “We said: ‘This is our property. We are getting a lot of benefit from this company. You cannot burn this.’ ”

The young villagers listened to their elders and left the farm alone.

At least 800 people from Alaga Dore work at the farm, which also maintains the village’s water pump and generator and poured a concrete floor for its school.

Yet just 18 miles away, the Giving Tree Nursery was attacked by another group two days later despite the Belgian company’s own efforts to support the local community.

Ingrid van der Schaaf, Giving Tree’s research manager, was there when reports of the attacks began, and she fled for the capital.

Workers and some locals tried in vain to protect the farm, which grows beans, peas, peppers and okra for export to Europe. When van der Schaaf returned, she found much of it gutted.

“They destroyed the manager’s compound and staff quarters,” she said, speaking by phone from the Netherlands. “It was shocking to see.”

The fields and some of the bigger equipment were untouched, but the farm now has no means to sow, harvest or transport a crop. “You see all the damage and think, ‘For what?’ ” van der Schaaf said. “There are 500 jobs.”

The Machiels Group, which owns the farm, is still deciding its future in Ethiopia.

“What the next few months will bring, you simply don’t know,” said its foreign projects manager, Hendrik Schoebrechts, speaking from Belgium. “Will there be another uprising?”

According to Emma Gordon, East Africa analyst for Verisk Maplecroft, a U.K.-based risk consultancy, many investors are waiting to see whether the government has a better solution to the unrest than repression.

“The protests have raised issues that will need more than a military response, and unless there is a perception that some of these underlying problems are being tackled, I think risk-sensitive sectors will be cautious to enter the country,” she said.

In the wake of the state of emergency, the government has reshuffled the cabinet, adding several more Oromo ministers, and promised a more representative electoral system that will bring in opposition parties, which since 2015 have not had a single seat in Parliament.

New elections, however, are four years away, and the political crisis stems in part from the lack of faith Oromos have in their pro-government politicians.

Walking the perimeter of his farm, the sole untouched operation in the area, Driessen expressed doubt about the future, given the recent violence.

“It will affect new investors dramatically,” he said.

Latest UN Monitoring Group report on Eritrea

$
0
0


By SEMG


Summary


Pursuant to Security Council resolution 1907 (2009), sanctions were imposed on Eritrea on 23 December 2009. Since then, the Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea has visited Eritrea twice, most recently in 2011. Notwithstanding the initiatives and efforts of successive Chairs and other members of the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia and Eritrea to facilitate access to Eritrea for the Group, it has therefore been five years, of a total of seven years of sanctions, since members of the Group have met officials of the Government of Eritrea, or any other interlocutors, within Eritrea.

The Monitoring Group has received no replies to its official requests for cooperation on investigative and substantive matters from the Government throughout its current mandate, including to its formal requests for an official visit to Asmara. In addition, representatives of the Government have made no attempts or seized any opportunities to engage with the Group beyond responding to the initiatives of the Group for two meetings with the Permanent Representative of Eritrea to the United Nations, Girma Asmerom Tesfay, in New York, and at the Chair’s initiative at the end of the mandate, to discuss the preliminary findings of the Group, again with the Permanent Representative, who was in Asmara at the time. The Monitoring Group has sought indirect engagement with the Government through individuals who have access to the country, including returning diaspora Eritreans, academics, international journalists and diplomats. Unfortunately, engagement even with this broad range of individuals and entities who have had recent access to Eritrea remains largely insufficient for the Group to carry out its mandate effectively.

For its third concurrent mandate, the Monitoring Group has found no firm evidence of Eritrean support for the Somali Islamist group Harakat al-Shabaab al-Mujaahidiin. The Group has, however, continued to find consistent evidence of Eritrean support for armed groups operating in both Ethiopia and Djibouti. It is clear that Eritrea continues to harbour anti-Ethiopian armed groups, including the newly remodelled Patriotic Ginbot 7, and provides at least some logistical support to them. Evidence that the Eritrean authorities are providing weapons or training to such groups remains anecdotal, and largely based on interviews with former fighters under the auspices of either the Ethiopian or Djiboutian authorities.

In its previous report (S/2015/802), the Monitoring Group noted the defection to Ethiopia of the former Chair of the Tigray People’s Democratic Movement, Mola Asgedom, in September 2015. In August 2016, the Group interviewed him in Addis Ababa. He provided corroboration of past findings on the group, but offered no information on the fate of its remaining fighters following his defection. The Group also noted in its previous report the announcement of the formation of the Peoples’ Alliance for Freedom and Democracy, apparently incorporating various anti-Ethiopian movements, including the Ogaden National Liberation Front and the Oromo Liberation Front, but has not been able to assess the extent to which it currently poses a threat in Ethiopia.

The Group found further uncorroborated evidence of Eritrean support for the anti-Djiboutian movement, Front pour la restauration de l’unité et de la démocratie, which continued to commit low-level attacks in northern Djibouti throughout the current mandate. As previously reported, its relatively small size notwithstanding, the movement continues to undermine the normalization of relations between Djibouti and Eritrea and thus to obstruct the implementation of resolution 1862 (2009).

In its previous report, the Monitoring Group reported on a new strategic military relationship between Eritrea and Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates that involved allowing the Arab coalition to use Eritrean land, airspace and territorial waters in its anti-Houthi military campaign in Yemen. The Group concluded that the country’s making available to other Member States its land, territorial waters and airspace to conduct military operations in a third Member State did not in and of itself constitute a sanctions violation, but that any compensation diverted directly or indirectly towards activities that threatened peace and security in the region, or for the benefit of the Eritrean military, would constitute a violation.

Evidence collected by the Monitoring Group during the current mandate, including the construction of a permanent military base at Assab International Airport and a new permanent seaport adjacent to it, indicates that there may have been external support for infrastructure development that could benefit the Eritrean military. The Group has further documented the presence in Eritrea, whether for training or transit, of armed personnel and related military and naval equipment of various Member States other than Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The Group determines that the current terms of the arms embargo do not allow for such activities, nor are they covered under the terms of possible exemptions thereto.

Following the escape of two Djiboutian prisoners of war from Eritrea in 2011, a further four were released from Eritrea during the current mandate. The Government of Eritrea provided no formal explanation for its decision to break the stalemate in negotiations between Djibouti and Eritrea that were being mediated by the Government of Qatar. Neither did it provide information on the remaining combatants, whom Djibouti alleges have been missing in action since 2008. In September 2016, the Permanent Representative of Eritrea to the United Nations informed the Group that one prisoner of war had died during his detention and the issue had subsequently been brought to a close by the Government of Qatar on 18 March 2016.

Owing to the continuing lack of transparency with regard to government revenue and expenditure, and the refusal to cooperate with the Monitoring Group on such matters, the Group has made little progress in determining the extent to which revenue of the Government of Eritrea has been allocated to support armed groups destabilizing the region or to conduct activities constituting a breach of the arms embargo. Similarly, the Group is no further forward in determining the extent to which revenue from the mining sector in particular may be contributing to arms embargo violations or destabilization within the region. Nevertheless, the possible diversion of funds for the potential purpose of sanctions violations remains an issue of concern.


Recommendations


Disassociation of Eritrea and Somalia sanctions


121. Given that the Group has been unable to find conclusive evidence of Eritrean support for Al-Shabaab in Somalia for three consecutive years, the Monitoring Group recommends that the Security Council consider the disassociation of Eritrea and Somalia sanctions, potentially through one of the following technical options:

(a) The establishment of a separate committee and its monitoring group on Eritrea;
(b) The establishment of a separate committee on Eritrea, with the Monitoring Group as currently configured supporting both committees;
(c) The establishment of a distinct monitoring group on Eritrea reporting to the current Committee.

Bilateral and multilateral support to Eritrea

122. The Monitoring Group recommends that the Security Council request Member States and appropriate international and regional organizations to consider offering the Government of Eritrea support for the development of a comprehensive programme on strengthening the capacity of public financial management.

Military operations involving Eritrean land, territorial waters, airspace and security forces

123. In the light of the two-way arms embargo on Eritrea, as outlined in paragraphs 5 and 6 of resolution 1907 (2009), and the continuing military activities by Member States within and nearby the port of Assab, as described in section II.A of the present report, the Monitoring Group recommends that the Committee provide advice to Member States on compliance with the embargo.

-------
Continue reading the full report below:

[Video] Eritrea's Ghirmay Ghebreslassie Wins NYC Marathon

$
0
0
Ghirmay Ghebreslassie, The Canadian Press


By TSN

Eritrea's Ghirmay Ghebreslassie has won the New York City Marathon in the men's field.

Ghebreslassie finished his debut in New York with an unofficial time of 2 hours, 7 minutes, 51 seconds.

For most of the course, the men's field was a three-man race between Ghebreslassie, Kenya's Lucas Rotich and Ethiopia's Lelisa Desisa. By mile 20, Ghebreslassie gradually began pulling away.

The 20-year-old beat Rotich by 62 seconds and became the youngest male winner in New York. The previous youngest male winners were Alberto Salazar in 1980 and Tom Fleming in 1973, who won as 22-year-olds.

Defending champion Stanley Biwott withdrew at the 10-mile mark with a right calf injury. He also dropped out in the Rio Olympics after getting sick.

American Abdi Abdirahman placed third.

Desisa, who was the runner-up in New York in 2014 and a two-time Boston Marathon winner, dropped out at the 22nd mile.

Ethiopia's Candidate to Lead the World Health Organization Contracts Foot-in-Mouth Disease

$
0
0
Tedros Adhanom seeks to be the Director-General of WHO after helping his TPLF regime commit gross human rights violations in Ethiopia



By Endalk | Global Voice

Ethiopia's candidate for Director-General of World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom, shocked many observers when he displayed a complete lack of knowledge about global health strategies during a candidates’ forum on November 2, 2016. Though Adhanom has served in the Ethiopian government as both minister of health and foreign affairs, he failed to answer a basic question about his claims that he is running a campaign on a framework that promotes the health needs of the developing world.

“Sorry, the question is not clear, can you clarify?” he answered, when a representative from Brazil asked him to explain why he claims to represent the developing world, when the agenda he advocated in his presentation espoused the health agenda of the developed world. Instead of answering the question, Adhanom tried to engage in a conversation with the Brazilian representative, apparently hoping to grasp what the question meant. Awkwardly, the moderator intervened, trying to help Adhanom understand the question.

Adhanom also stumbled with another question at the same forum, when asked about the technical cooperation of WHO member states:



This embarrassing performance could hurt Adhanom’s current political campaign for the post of head of the global health body. Recently, he was relieved of his ministerial duties in the Ethiopian government, following a cabinet reshuffle. During his presentation last week, Adhanom said the Ethiopian government replaced him with a new foreign minister, so he could focus on the campaign.

Though he's endorsed by African Union, Adhanom has been under continuous assault from prominent members of Ethiopian civil society and opposition groups, who argue that his ties with the Ethiopian regime should disqualify him from leading WHO. These groups have also started an online petition.

When Adhanom launched his campaign in April 2016, Ethiopia was beset by anti-government protests. Citing the government's violent actions against protesters, 20 Ethiopian political and civic organizations signed a letter declaring Adhanom unfit to lead the World Health Organization, saying he is the face of the regime.

The letter read: “Mr. Adhanom did not lend confidence as a public health figure while he served as the Minister of Health in Ethiopia. […] His tenure as head of the Federal Ministry of Health was fraught with mismanagement and incompetence.”

The letter refers to an audit conducted by the Office of the Inspector General, which was prompted by reports of “mismanagement of money and incompetence.” Subsequent research available on the Internet confirmed that the audit uncovered detailed evidence of financial mismanagement.

In a separate letter, one activist outlined his reasons why Mr. Adhanom should not be allowed anywhere near the World Health Organization.

The human rights website “Al Mariam” also offers a strong denunciation of Adhanom's WHO candidacy:

Adhanom’s shallowness and cluelessness in matters of foreign policy and diplomacy are simply incredible.

His public speeches and statements generally lack not only substance and coherence, but are simply nonsensical. In July 2015, Adhanom said Ethiopia is a democracy with one hundred percent of the vote! (Of course, so did Obama. Two “nonsenses” don’t make one bit of sense!)

Adhanom’s diplomatic speeches are chock full of platitudes, clichés, buzzwords and hokum. He has a distinct proclivity to frame complex issues in worn out and left over phrases from the days of student activism of his late boss, thugmaster Meles Zenawi.

Adhanom manifests little understanding of international diplomacy and appears to lack even an elementary understanding of international law, treaties and conventions.

Meanwhile, Adhanom has been making the case that he would bring a fresh perspective to the WHO's leadership. Other than the African Union, some pro-government diaspora groups and international figures have also backed his candidacy.

Adhanom has relied heavily on social media to build his “brand” in Ethiopia — a country where access to social media is highly limited. Access isn't so restricted, however, that Adhanom's gaffes at the Nov. 2 forum haven't led to mockery online, where critics have enjoyed making fun of his surprising ignorance.

On Twitter, the hashtag #NoTedros4WHO gained popularity, with many users arguing that Adhanom has disqualified himself from holding any position at the WHO.


The Woyane-Trump Connection: Potential Implications of the US Presidential Elections

$
0
0
Donald Trump (Credit: AFP)




The recent revelation that the head of the Huajian Group, a major supplier of footwear for Ivanka Trump’s personal fashion collection, has plans to build a small industrial city near Addis Ababa has sent shockwaves across the Ethiopian community in the Diaspora. According to an AFP report, the company intends to employ up to 30,000 workers by 2020, with “exports reaching US$1 billion to US$1.5 billion.”

On the surface, Huarong’s plan might appear an attractive opportunity for a country like Ethiopia where the unemployment rate is disconcertingly high, even by the lowly standards of African nations.

However, given the degree of corruption that is pervasive in the Woyane regime, there is every reason to believe that the TPLF leaders have already claimed a stake in the business proposition. More ominously, if Trump is elected president, his daughter’s business interest in the country may have even more devastating implications for the ongoing struggle by the people of Ethiopia to extricate themselves from the shackles of Woyane repression.

As recently postulated in a BBC article, Trump could be: “an erratic president who appears willing to do anything when it comes to torture, bombing, relations with authoritarian states“.

It is, therefore, by no means outside the realm of possibility to imagine how the corrupt Woyane regime could use a Trump presidency to advance its repressive agenda, while simultaneously extorting money from Ivanka’s Addis supplier, as it has been doing for decades from the unscrupulous Chinese companies.

Recently, the Ethiopian community was shocked to learn how much influence Sheikh Mohammed Al-Amoudi has had on the Clintons through his donation for the Clinton Foundation. The that fact the Sheikh is an ardent supporter of the repressive regime is, of course, public knowledge.

It is also well known that in the previous two presidential elections Ethiopian-Americans overwhelmingly supported the candidacy of Barack Obama. They were especially inspired by his vison of freedom for the oppressed, and his presumptive stand against the loathsome philosophy of the TPLF, as articulated in his famous words: “….if we discriminate on the basis of race or tribe or ethnicity, then the fragile bonds of civilization will fray. The world is too small, we are too packed together, for us to be able to resort to those old ways of thinking.”

Those words of wisdom, however, proved to be empty rhetoric when he paradoxically praised the EPRDF as democratically elected during his ill-advised visit to the country, despite the fact that the regime has been labelled as one of the most repressive on the face of the earth. While the people of Ethiopia have long known the close ties of his National Security advisor, Susan Rice, to the Woyane regime and her fanatical worship of the late Meles Zenawi, the President’s disregard for their plight, including his complete ignorance of the ongoing massacre against the Amhara and Oromo ethnic groups, would leave a lasting impression of ignominy and disenchantment in their collective psyche.

As the people of Ethiopia back home are heroically fighting against the tyrannical TPLF regime, those of us in the United States should seriously consider the implications of the upcoming US elections, and use our voting power to contribute to the deterrence of a seriously devastating outcome. Admittedly, the Obama administration has been totally disappointing, and even disgraceful, in terms of meeting what was minimally expected of its adherence to its promise of advocating and taking actions to promote democracy and the rule of law in places like Ethiopia. One also has every reason to be appalled by the association of the Clintons with the TPLF supporter, Mohammed Al-Amoudi.

However, the alternative is no less abhorrent, and may even be more detrimental to the success of the ongoing uprising in the various parts of our native country. It is, therefore, absolutely imperative for all Ethiopian-Americans to go to the polls on November 8th and contribute our share in averting a potentially catastrophic scenario.

The writer may be reached at beyene50@gmail.com

Breaking Records: Ghirmay’s Win in NYC

$
0
0
Ghirmay Ghebreslassie


Breaking Records: Ghirmay’s Win in NYC
Dr. Fikrejesus Amahazion


Eritrea’s Ghirmay Ghebreslassie won the New York City Marathon, among the world’s pre-eminent long-distance annual running events, with a time of 2 hours, 7 minutes, 51 seconds, finishing over a minute ahead of Kenya's Lucas Rotich, who took second place, and Somali-born American Abdi Abdirahman, who finished third. Although it was only his race debut and though confronted by challenging, windy conditions, Ghirmay’s time qualified him as the third-fastest runner in the marathon's 46-year history. The 20-year-old Eritrean also made history as the race’s youngest-ever male winner, breaking the record previously held by Alberto Salazar (1980), Tom Fleming (1973), and Sheldon Karlin (1972), who all won as 22-year-olds.

Founded by Fred Lebow, the New York City Marathon was first held in 1970 with 127 competitors running loops around Central Park, a city attraction. From those humble beginnings, the annual race has grown to become the world’s largest marathon; this year’s edition saw more than 50,000 people from 120 countries participate in the race across the five boroughs (New York City, in the US state of New York, is composed of five boroughs: Manhattan, the Bronx, Queens, Brooklyn, and Staten Island). Notably, hundreds of thousands of spectators were also in attendance, while the race was followed by millions more worldwide.

Ghirmay’s impressive win on Sunday, where he was rarely threatened, was just the latest in an extraordinary series of recent results by the talented youngster. In 2015, he won the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) World Championships held in China, becoming the youngest-ever winner, while at the recent Summer Olympics in Brazil he finished a highly-respectable fourth place. The latter result would surely have been even higher but for a slight, yet costly, blip he encountered during the race.

As the precocious youngster continues to blaze a trail of success, the question on many minds is just how far can he go? In sport, while reaching the pinnacle is a challenging task, remaining there can often prove to be much more difficult. Moreover, the world of sports is filled with innumerable cases of bright, young stars that quickly shot to prominence and success before fizzling out almost just as fast. Beyond the obvious factors, such as physical development, improvement, and training (and avoiding injuries, etc.), proper mindset and inner motivation are often critical.

Consider the case of Real Madrid footballer Cristiano Ronaldo, the three-time winner of the Balon d’Or as the world’s best player. The Portuguese superstar’s success and numerous accolades are not solely due to his considerable talent, but also the fruit of his sheer work ethic and relentless pursuit of perfection. Countless teammates, opponents, and analysts describe how Ronaldo today is almost unrecognizable from the wiry, flashy, more style than substance and often frustrating, winger who came to the world’s attention with Manchester United years ago. Driven by a passionate desire to be “the world’s best,” the young Ronaldo dedicated himself to constant improvement and development, spending extra hours on the training pitch, in the gym, and at recovery sessions. Such a dedicated approach helped transform him from a young boy with bags of talent, yet often lacking the final product, to the all-conquering, record-setting player that is now firmly entrenched within discussions about the greatest ever to play the game.

In this context, Ghirmay’s modesty and laser-like focus are encouraging. The young runner from unassuming, rural roots in the Zoba Debub region of Eritrea who ran several miles to school every day remains hungry, regularly speaks of achieving even greater things in the sport, and continues to follow a strict, punishing training regimen. Remarkably (or ominously for his competitors), many observers suggest that he is just scratching the surface of his potential and can still improve by leaps and bounds.

Another important aspect of Ghirmay’s rise to success is what it represents for his nation. In 2015, Ghirmay’s win at the World Championships in China 2015 was met with a massive nationwide celebration and he was welcomed back to the country with a colorful, music-filled parade in Asmara, the capital. The city’s streets were packed for hours as people jostled to get a glimpse of the young star. For Eritrea, a young, low-income country located within the fractious Horn of Africa region, Ghirmay is a source of enormous inspiration and tremendous pride, as well as a great role model for many of the country’s impressionable youth.

After Sunday’s race, Ghirmay stated, "I am really proud with my victory today to be the first one from my country. Nobody before from Eritrea won in the major marathons." As Eritrea anxiously prepares to welcome back its conquering hero, millions of adoring fans hope his recent win is just the latest in a long, glorious career that is filled with many more.


Viewing all 4577 articles
Browse latest View live