Quantcast
Channel: Madote
Viewing all 4577 articles
Browse latest View live

Vulnerabilities of Cyber Security in Africa Unfold, Eritrean Youth Forewarns on Tackling Measurements

$
0
0




Vulnerabilities of Cyber Security in Africa Unfold, Eritrean Youth Forewarns on Tackling Measurements

By: Mark Owen, HorMid (Sci-Tech Gate)

As it has been apparent that African countries are atop of the main victims of the integrated and individually managed cybercrime, a preface in a paper by Eritrean Information-Technology experts recommends on possible trends to address the matter. Marcel Claxton has the reports.

The Cost of Cybercrime in Africa in 2017 was estimated at $3.5 Billion, a rise from 2016, where African countries were estimated to lose at least 2/3 of the activated victims, two Eritrean experts comment on pre and post measurements African countries have to take thereby to tackle the eminent challenge. “Despite the fact that cyber-attacks occur with greater frequency and intensity around the world, many either go unreported or are under-reported, leaving the public with a false sense of security about the threat they pose and the lives and property they impact,” the paper by the Eritrean experts in the respective filed clarifies.

Though Western Africa has been atop of every region in the continent in the frequency and its subsequent repercussions of cybercrime attack, “a threat in web application security is growing as more governmental and private organizations and companies join the internet, a lot personal information is being shared every day in many vulnerable Africa websites. This leaves millions of African people open to cyber-attacks,” the youth add in paper they crafted with a vision time to ‘Make Our African Websites Safer (MOAWS).’

With high records of series cyber-attacks in Kenya from East Africa, Awet Ghideon, a Computer Engineering graduate from Eritrea Institute of Technology, states “ [no matter of where,] governments, businesses and individuals are all being targeted on an exponential basis, and, undoubtedly, infrastructure is becoming a target of choice among both individual and state-sponsored cyber-attackers. This has served to demonstrate just how vulnerable cities, states and countries have become, and the growing importance of achieving global risk agility in the face of such a threat.”

Jimmy Mebrahtu, one of the two Eritrean youth experts, also articulate that “creating a joint African web cyber security team that will protect, give consultancy and awareness to all African website owners towards fulfilling the African Union convention on cyber security and personal data protection,” is the mission of ‘Make Our African Websites Safer (MOAWS).’ “Working together with all African governmental and private organizations towards increasing awareness on secure and safe web applications, is the forefront objective of our mission,” adds.

By warning that if hackers and cyber-terrorists take full control of the websites or gain an administrative privilege that they can easily edit, modify, delete, and steal data from the vulnerable websites, “stealing personal information of an individual already shared with those vulnerable sites, economic espionages, disseminating fraud data, possibilities of escalated information chaos and other difficulties are in place if appropriate measurements are not taken,” the paper adds.

With an advocacy that isolationism from the internet world is not a pragmatic solution to cybercrime and cyber-terrorism, the Hague Security supported report forewarned both those completely free and completely closed countries in the internet arena as apparent threats on human development profiles. “Of course, to tackle the vulnerabilities, simply updating the Content management system (CMS) used to the latest patched version can prevent a lot of threat from the intruders,” assert both graduate from Computer Engineering of Eritrea Institute of Technology.

Following to the assertion by BBC in which government and commercial online services are mentioned for they could become the next frontier for illegal activity in Africa, security experts are warning that news media, healthcare, educational institutions, banks, airlines, technology companies and online shopping business, are getting momentum focus of cyber-attackers and similar internet-centered crime surrogates.

In support to the findings by Awet Ghideon and Jimmy Mebrahtu, the Hague Security Delta unfolds tremendous increase in Ransomware attack which was delimited to 35% only in 2015. “We—experts at PandaLabs-- analyzed 75 million distinct malware files from the top ten targeted regions of Africa; of course, West Africa is the main hub, while the Maghreb Region—North Africa—is on the path to other escalated possibilities of cyber attackers. Though countries in Horn Africa seem less susceptible to cyber-crime, the availability of low internet access and very saddening IT infrastructures have been armored wall of defense for development and notorious deeds by cyber-intruders paradoxically,” reads the paper.

Meanwhile, in a time where East African countries are competing on fierce ground of bidding their ports for different purposes, the possibilities on Maritime tasks has also been intact. “There is no denying the maritime industry's vulnerability to cyber-attack. Like other filed, it is also susceptible to such attacks by cyber-intruders as evidences from 179 ships hijacked coast-off Somalia and Horn Africa in 2012 shows that cyber-attackers are also engaging in transferring vital information on the targeted entities,” assert the Maritime Net Work.

Taking all the aforementioned eventualities, both graduates and experts on the cyber domain from Eritrea elucidate governments and individuals to reinforce necessary focus on the prevalence and escalation of the daily threats. “No one is free; and no one has to worry if we all study the fundamental ways of ensuring our computer and mobile surfing systems. Just taking the steps are what expect from us,” conclude Jimmy Mebrahtu and Awet Ghideon while expecting to present their looks to their African counterparts.

___________________
Mark Owen is a fellow instructor at IT Matters and writes on cyber security and on global internet trends. Use his Tor email Mo-20@tor.com for reasonable requests.



Is There a Final and Binding Agreement Without a Legal Financial Compensation?

$
0
0
Some of the 80,000 Eritreans and Ethiopians of Eritrean origins that were robbed of their wealth and property after the Ethiopian regime expelled them to Eritrea in 1999. 


Is There a Final and Binding Agreement Without a Legal Financial Compensation?


Special May 24, 2018 The 27th Eritrean Independence Day Edition


By: Yemane Tsegay

Aerospace Engineer/Legal Advocacy
[May 31, 2018]




1. INTRODUCTION

This Article is a synopsis of the Boundary Peace Agreement between the Government of Eritrea and the Government of Ethiopia and it focuses on the following question: Is there a Final and Binding Agreement without a legal financial compensation? The agreement established two neutral commissions: the Boundary Commission, and the Claims Commission. They were seated in the Hague with the Permanent Court of Arbitration serving as registry and the UN Cartographic Section providing technical support.

In July 2000 following the ceasefire of the border war between “Ethiopia and Eritrea” the United Nations Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea (UNMEE) was established by the U.N. Security Council.
The initial task of the UNMEE was: they invited the two governmental heads of states to Algiers for asecond meeting to sign the peace proposals encapsulated with the OAU Framework Agreement, known as the “Algiers accords” set out the necessary legal procedure outlined to delimit and demarcate the border based on pertinent colonial treaties (1900, 1902 and 1908) and applicable international law."

Additionally, the Eritrean Government and Ethiopian Government (hereafter called parties) stipulated that “the delimitation and demarcation determinations of the Commission shall be “final and binding”.

It was spelled out in Article 4.15 of the Algiers Agreement in which both parties agreed that “each party shall respect the border so determined, as well as the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the other party”.

In retrospect, the agreement between the two parties was fully accepted in its entirety of the agreement (Framework Agreement of the Modalities) for its implementation and without any clouded freedom of conscience and constitutional privacy, both parties signed by the two governmental heads of states. It was held in Algiers with the total understanding of both parties in conformance to the Organization of African Unity (OAU) on 12 to 14 July 1999.

The agreement was witnessed by the Algerian President, the UN Secretary-General and representatives of the OAU, the European Union (EU) and the U.S.

The Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission delivered its decision on delimitation of the border between Eritrea and Ethiopia on Saturday, April 13, 2002. That decision was delivered at a session attended by all of the members of the Boundary Commission at the premises of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Peace Palace in The Hague.

The task of delimitation by the Boundary Commission was accepted by both governments as agreed per Article 4 of the Algiers Agreement. When the delimitation decision was rendered, both Parties promptly announced their acceptance. Shortly after that, the Commission undertook the steps necessary to initiate the process of demarcation.

Having completed the delimitation, the Commission moved on to effecting the actual demarcation of that boundary located on the ground. Then in September 2003 the Commission encountered obstacles from the Ethiopian side prohibiting the field work within the territory which is now occupied the (Western and Eastern Sectors of Eritrea) to the pillar emplacement. Ethiopia is now under its legal obligation not be able to suspend or terminate the agreement, because it was agreed and signed as a final and binding contract. In addition Ethiopia is in bridge of the Commission’s findings, that it must have been accomplished the withdrawal of its troops and other related equipment in a matter of 24 hours before the end of September 2003.

Continue reading:



Eritrea vs Ethiopia: The True Dichotomy between Demarcation and Dialogue

$
0
0
Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflika (C) stands between Eritrean President Isayas Afewerki (L) who shakes hands with Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi (R) after signing peace agreements in Algiers December 12, 2000.


Eritrea vs Ethiopia: The True Dichotomy between Demarcation and Dialogue


By Haile Habtegaber | The Netherlands

It is to be recalled and can also be revisited at the link (http://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_XXV/83-195.pdf), the EEBC gave its final and binding verdict anchored on the most meticulous consideration of all the known categories of territorial claims. But what is even more fundamental here is that the EEBC has most conspicuously relied upon the pertinent historical treaties and associated international law categories that shaped the configuration of the border between Eritrea and Ethiopia.

Here the reader whosoever he/she is, must realize that of all the categories of territorial claims, the application of the Treaty Law is paramount because , treaties are verifiable material evidence embedded as they are in written documentation including maps and other cartographic material and physical references. They contain legally recognizable agreement voluntarily entered by the parties concerned. To borrow a business management term TREATIES are S.M.A.R.T. ie Specific-Measurable-Achievable-Realistic-Time (should I say Timeless). They are there and will remain out there. No amount of false rhetoric of irredentism can change their essence and historical value.

Now my intention here is not to counter argue to the incessant call, by whoever may be, for dialogue before demarcation, to resolve the border dispute if that was the real issue. No, I do not want to dignify this malicious and futile scheme by responding to it. But since we are living in the hyped digital age, Eritrea’s explicitly justified rejection of this misplaced quest for dialogue may be misunderstood either due to ignorance or by design, I shall attempt to briefly remark on this saga. But first things first. Here all prospective readers- journalists, diplomats, the so called ‘experts’, ’human rights activists’, enemies and friends of Eritrea, must understand and acknowledge two simple but critical facts-:

One: that the border is demarcated and what remains is erecting sign pillars on the ground. Accordingly, demarcation is no more an issue. Here the core issue is the withdrawal of Ethiopian forces from sovereign Eritrean territories.

Second: that the EEBC verdict is final and binding. As may be recalled subsequent to the release of the final and binding verdict, the Ethiopian side was in the seventh heaven calling for national celebration big time!

The spokes persons of the TPLF clique boasted and declared victory claiming that they got all what the argued for. But wait - Oh Badme? As expectedly as can be, the flash point town of Badme indeed belonged to Eritrea. With lightening speed effect, the TPLF showed its true colours of deceitfulness and the rest became history. They began to make U-turns and flip-flopped on their wilfully committed acceptance to abide by the Algeries’ agreement. But when one is shameless one is also shameful!

Let me now turn to the wickedly contrived agenda to create association between the issues of dialogue and demarcation to the point of convolution. What I find outrageous is the fallacious and most illogical attempt to bundle the two together. For any person with no midget mind and if we are to be guided by common sense, the two issues are not only separate but are also unrelated and mutually exclusive. Demarcation in this dispute is a technical and legally binding and final process by which the two countries willingly agreed in advance to resolve their dispute as governed by applicable international law to determine the borderline between them.

Thus the issue of Demarcation is a legal issue. And as such it is a legal issue that concerns not only Eritrea and Ethiopia but also the UNSC and the all the guarantors of the Algeries Agreement. This is because adherence and submission to the deliberations and final adjudication of the International Court of Justice as an international legal instrument employed to resolve disputes like this one, is at stake.

On the other hand the issue of dialogue is a separate non legal issue that has nothing to do with the settlement of the dispute. It may or may not come up subsequent to demarcation. However it can pursued in order to deal with the normalization of bilateral relationship and promote peaceful coexistence beneficial to the two countries in the aftermath of the settlement of the dispute. It is dependent upon mutual acceptance to cooperate for whatever purpose both parties deem necessary. As such it is a voluntary and an evolving process that both countries can agree or disagree to undertake without any precondition and/or being obliged by any UN authorised binding enforcement mechanism. I have never come across any precedence where two independent countries were legally forced to establish relationship of this nature. Are we here for forced marriage? Nonetheless, in my opinion such a mutually beneficial, voluntary, sincere cooperative and forward looking relationship should be desired as this can help jump-start the healing process of the deep scars left by TPLF initiated war of invasion.

Nevertheless the fundamental question that any person ought to ask is - what is the underlying rational of Ethiopia’s revolving prime ministers’noises of seeking dialogue with Eritrea before demarcation? They proclaim they accept the EEBC verdict in full. I remember at one point (2004 was it, I think) the late Meles Zenawi said Ethiopia fully accepts the verdict in principle and even up 85% of the border demarcation. Wow! Did he mean Eritrea should cede the remaining 15%? This is absurdity of the highest order and what reason is there accepting 85% to the exclusion of 15% does not virtually invalidate the declaration of the principle of full acceptance of the EEBC verdict? But how can he explain to us from his grave as to what he meant by accepting 85%? Of course as is typical with his nature, it did not take him long to dump his very words altogether next time round. Clearly given such devious behaviour, one wonders when will this spiteful beating about the bush stop as every incumbent Ethiopian Prime minister seems to follow his predecessor instead of addressing the issue head-on and be done with. If one was to make any sense of this plea for dialogue, it should have been wise and necessary before the war of invasion when Eritrea forcefully called for.

Of course it does not take Einstein to figure out this audacious illogical PR gimmick. What they want is to take the issue out of the legal framework of the Algeries Peace Agreement and put on the table some of their hidden demands (not hidden for genuine Eritreans) unacceptable to Eritrea and then cry foul. And when their untenable argument fails they would declare: ‘people of the world behold! We want peace but the Eritrean government rejects peaceful resolution of the dispute and continues with its aggressive stance’’. Because they know they do not have valid legal ground, they believe if they beat the drum of peace and dialogue too hard and too often, they might succeed to realise their obscene agenda of putting conditionality to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Eritrea retrospectively. This is what resides in the minds of the common thugs Weyanes and others deplorably some of the Amhara ethnic group members. They think they possess extra ordinary genius that can easily outmanoeuvre the Eritrean brain. Certainly, we know they knowingly and deliberately lie and distort historical facts in the hope that they are clever enough to persuade a few fop poodle hired renegade Eritreans to speak in their favour in the name of Eritrea. How often have we heard them recycling their disgusting assertions that, had it not been for the stubbornness of the political leaders, the Eritrean people would not have wanted to secede from their motherland Ethiopia as if the country was not under occupation and devastating subjugation! Such is their deluded audacity. No wonder, blatant falsification and untruthfulness bode well with them and are hall marks of their calculated and distorted narration when it come to the historical relationship between Eritrea and Ethiopia. But we Eritreans know that to tell a lie is ok from the perspective of Ethiopian body politic so long they believe it may deliver. And unfortunately it is ingrained in the culture. It seems they are uniquely incapable of accepting the historical truth and facts of Eritrea’s history.

Recognition of Eritrea’s factual history and the stark reality of its lawfully cleared independence is an anathema to some of them. Frankly there can’t be more culpable moral and ethical demeanour than this. And I say they would be well advised to leave Eritrea in peace and be concerned about the continuity of Ethiopia as this hangs in the balance.

Regrettably I also hear not only some naïve people, but also some people in the diplomatic circles, never mind the various fake think-tank experts, calling for dialogue. But whether an absurd and a nonsense idea is espoused by one or a million people remains the same - absurd and nonsense. Ok I accept for misinformed people, the word dialogue may be attractive and I have no problem with that. Ignorance ought to be pardoned and they may make amends when enlightened. But one of the most serious problem I have is, with diplomats disposed to promote this preposterous and superficial argument of dialogue. While they probably know that it is not a workable suggestion and does not address the issue at hand head-on, they nonetheless entertain the idea of dialogue. Either by intent or predisposition, they gloss over the point at issue and dwell on advising both countries to resolve their difference peacefully – adding insult to injury as they say. Although I dare not call this childlike, it is one of the detrimental and prevalent mode of thinking laced with diplomatic niceties that undermines UN authority to a point close to dysfunctionality.

As any layperson with the interest of the peoples of the two countries in my heart, I fully support dialogue to move forward and gear all efforts to cooperation and development on the basis of win win situation. In this respect Ethiopians to whichever ethnic group (although these days it is difficult to speak of one Ethiopia) they belong, must come to the realisation that the interest of the peoples of the two countries is best served when they desist from their misguided and fallacious allegation that Eritrea wishes evil to Ethiopia. I am here referring particularly to those Ethiopians who knowingly and deliberately include Hizbawi Ginbar (aka Shabea) in their feeble attempt to attack the Weyane clique. Amazingly, for all the ills Ethiopia faces, they say Shabea is to blame. What can one say to a mind- set defaulted to a configuration bordering insanity? May God
have mercy on them!

I also urge them to accept the stark reality that the Eritrean Red Sea coastline is Eritrean and jettison the inane syndrome of outlet to the sea and stop building castles in the sky with the full knowledge that Ethiopia can also fully avail itself to meet its maritime services with mutual agreement of the two countries. Incidentally this has been the stand of their Eritrean government all along.

Finally let me close by restating that demarcation is not an issue anymore. What is at issue is when will Ethiopia pull out it forces and end its occupation of Eritrean lands. Theatrical rhetoric aside, what exactly is the new Prime minister of Ethiopia going to do. His olive branch gesture is not even as clear as mud. Only when he takes the overdue decision of evacuating his forces from Eritrean lands will his call for dialogue and peaceful coexistence resonate with the peoples of Eritrea and then harvest the fruits of the synergistic and collaborative relationship between these two wonderfully unique countries.

Viva Eritrea Libre



British national Andy Tsege 'overjoyed' to return to UK after years on death row in Ethiopia

$
0
0
Andy Tsege was warmly greeted at Heathrow Airport


British national Andy Tsege 'overjoyed' to return to UK after years on death row in Ethiopia


By Andy Hayes | SkyNews

A British national who spent four years on death row in Ethiopia has arrived back in the UK after being pardoned last month.

Supporters surrounded Andargachew Tsege, known as Andy, as he walked through arrivals at Heathrow Airport.

He told Sky News he was "overjoyed" to be home and "overwhelmed" by the reception he received.

Mr Tsege said he did not think the campaign to free him and the welcome he got would be "as large, as emotional, as effective as this".
Andy Tsege's family were waiting for him at Heathrow 

Being away had been "terrible", he added, and very hard on his family.

Missing four years of his children growing up had been the "most painful thing".

"The price they paid, the kids, that's very painful," he said.

Were he not a father, Mr Tsege said he would not have minded dying in prison for a "cause I believed in".

While in detention, he said he was "completely sealed off" from any information.

Mr Tsege was kidnapped in Yemen in 2014 and taken to Ethiopia, which he left in the 1970s after criticising the country's ruling party.

The father-of-three sought asylum in the UK in 1979.

In 2009, he was accused by the Ethiopian authorities of being a terrorist, tried with others in his absence and sentenced to death.

After being taken back to Ethiopia, he was held in secret detention and solitary confinement for a year.

Theresa May has thanked her Ethiopian counterpart, Abiy Ahmed, for the release of Mr Tsege and other prisoners.

Mr Tsege, who is in his 60s, praised the British government for its efforts in helping to free him.

There had been a lot of "silent diplomacy", he said, and knew the UK authorities had been "doing their best".



Landlocked Ethiopia Plans to Build Navy, Prime Minister Says

$
0
0
Ethiopian PM Abiy Ahmed


Landlocked Ethiopia to reestablish navy


By Xinhuanet

ADDIS ABABA, June 3 (Xinhua) — Landlocked Ethiopia is to establish a naval force more than two decades after it was disbanded, state media Radio Fana has said.

The announcement was made by Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed during a meeting with officials from the Ethiopia National Defense Force, said the Radio Fana report.

However, the announcement did not specify where the navy would be based or when it would be established.

Ethiopia had a navy up to the early 1990s, when the independence of Eritrea left Ethiopia landlocked and prompted the Ethiopian government to disband the navy.

____

Landlocked Ethiopia Plans to Build Navy, Prime Minister Says

By Nizar Manek | Bloomberg

Landlocked Ethiopia is planning to build a navy, Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed said during a briefing of the heads of the country’s National Defense Force.

“Following the efforts made to build capacity of our national defense, we built one of the stronger ground and air forces in Africa,” the ruling party-funded Fana Broadcasting Corp. reported Abiy as saying on Friday. “We should build our naval force capacity in the future.”

Two calls to the mobile phone of Abiy’s national security adviser, Abadula Gemada, didn’t connect.

Ethiopia currently has a civilian Ethiopian Maritime Training Institute on Lake Tana. It trains more than 500 marine engineers and electro-technical officers each year and plans to increase this to more than 1,000 officers annually, according to its website.

Abiy’s government in May agreed to develop Port Sudan on the Red Sea and agreed with Djibouti to swap shares in state-owned ports, airlines, and telecommunications. It also agreed to acquire land at Kenya’s Lamu Port for “logistical facilitation,” according to a joint communiqué issued after a meeting between Abiy and Kenyan president Uhuru Kenyatta.

Earlier this year, Ethiopia took a stake in a port in Somaliland, a semi-autonomous part of Somalia that aspires to statehood and borders Djibouti. Somaliland will host a naval base for the United Arab Emirates.

Abiy Ahmed Ali asks for help in dealing with Eritrea

$
0
0



Disclaimer: African Intelligence routinely fabricates information on Eritrea. So take this news with a grain of salt. 

Abiy Ahmed Ali asks for help in dealing with Eritrea

By AfricanIntelligence 

On 19 May, the Ethiopian prime minister Abiy Ahmed Ali took advantage of his official visit to Saudi Arabia to ask the crown prince Mohammed bin Salman to use his country's influence with the Eritrean president Issayas Afeworki to help him kick-start peace negotiations with his north-eastern neighbour. Abiy Ahmed Ali promised the crown prince that Ethiopia will respect the Algiers accord if the Asmara regime agrees to broach other subjects. In response to a question on the conflict between Ethiopia and Eritrea at a gathering of the Tigrayan community at the palace on 22 May, the prime minister asserted that Saudi Arabia and the United States would soon be helping him to resolve the issue.



Eritrea, end and rebirth of an African dream

$
0
0
Author Alessandro Pellegatta


Eritrea, end and rebirth of an African dream


By Marilena Dolce | EritreaLive

The book “Eritrea, fine e rinascita di un sogno africano” by Alessandro Pellegatta will be published in the next few days, (Casa Editrice Besa, euro 15)

A beautiful book to be read in one breath, almost a novel, more than a guide, perhaps even a bit of a travel journal. Written as a report. In short, an exciting reading, to be done before leaving for Eritrea, to get to know the country, its past and present history. But not only this. A book to bring with you, if you leave for Eritrea. A book full of anecdotes, stories and practical information.

We talk about it with the author. First of all, where does your passion for Eritrea come from?

Eritrea is a complex country. To understand it you must go back in time. Learn about its colonial history to arrive to its contemporary one. You must learn to know the other which, as Kapuściński said, is a complex thing, sometimes a dangerous one, but, which also helps you find your own origins. Unfortunately, nowadays fears and ideologies, which prevent you from seeing and understanding, have replaced a culture of diversity and comparison.

In your book you say that you were not born as a writer, it was travelling that led you to write. Travels “to lose yourself”, travels “to find yourself”. How come you found yourself in Eritrea?

Travelling for me means to lose myself, to rediscover my curiosity for the world. Above all for the South of the world, which represents the future of humanity without a doubt.

Why Eritrea?

A journey to Eritrea is an extraordinary experience. You must abandon old thoughts and prepare yourself to see a different reality, of extraordinary beauty. Eritrea is a country, which almost nobody talks about.

A small country, with a very ancient history. From the land of Punt, to the port cities on the Red Sea, in aprticular Adulis.

Today Eritrea is a country that is looking for its own way for a development far from old and new colonialisms. Far from the appetites of the great powers and multinational companies. Despite the Red Sea offshore platforms, oil, gas, gold fields …

And Eritrea is in a strategic position for the passage of oil tankers. Also, ahead of it has a hot territory, Yemen, an area of ​​war. The tensions with Djibouti, the only US military outpost in Africa, are also being rekindled. And the arm wrestle with Ethiopia goes on …

And as Pasolini wrote, Eritrea is a completely different country than how we imagine it. And then you have Eritreans. They have elegance and dignity. In this elegance of popular gentlemen, Muslims, Christians and Copts are confused. These are nomadic and peasant populations.

In peasant villages over the centuries there has never been private property. The ownership of the land is collective, and there is a rotation of possession of the fields between the families. The nomads are even more essential, and they always travel light with their dromedaries. For centuries the Eritreans have become unaccustomed to possession, and this gives them a certain detachment from things.

And Eritrea is at the centre of a complex geopolitical situation?

To understand this, we need to know the history of the Red Sea, a sea highway that has allowed the development of the area and commerce. Without it, the Axumite civilization would not have been possible.

Today, geopolitics is complicated.

We do not know what is really happening. The Assab area is off limits because there are military posts. Yemen, a very poor country, an area of ​​dispute between Saudi and Iranian influences, and in which there is currently a very serious humanitarian emergency.

In 2009 Eritrea was accused of being a destabilizing country. The US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, declared, without proof, that Eritrea ​​supported Al Shaabab. However, even without any evidence, this accusation has become a leit motiv, along with the comparison with North Korea.

In actual fact, if we go and see what happens in neighboring Ethiopia, we do not find the democratic state that they would want us to believe. Instead, there is a very tense situation, of civil war, of ethnic conflicts. A situation of which we never speak.

It is not so in Eritrea. There are 9 ethnic groups with different languages ​​and cultures. The extraordinary thing about this country is that you walk in Asmara and see the Coptic church, the synagogue, the Catholic church, the Protestant church. There is complete religious tolerance and respect for diversity. There are no devastating conflicts as in the Islamic world. There is no terrorism. Al Qaeda was defeated in the bud, stopping its infiltration.

What role do women have in the Country?

The role of women in Eritrea is very important. No one knows that the Eritrean liberation movement was supported by women, who were 30 percent of the fighters. Massawa was freed by women. Currently, there are local female ministers and governors.

In your book you wrote: “Asmara is all but a nightmarish place”, to escape from. However, many young people have left the country, looking for a future in Europe, why?

For sure, the long military service is tough. The young conscripts cannot plan a future, a family. This applies to men and women …

But we ought to understand the mechanisms of cause and effects of this situation.

Eritrea is a country, which is living under an actual and perceived state of siege.

What do you mean?

The decision on the border between Eritrea and Ethiopia (Ed. 1998-2000 conflict ended with the Algiers Agreement favourable to Eritrea for the Badme area) was not enforced. Eritrea continues to be a poor country that suffers from the very strong pressure of Ethiopia, a world power.

Unfortunately, the moment of pacification has not yet arrived for Eritrea, which is why, inside the country, there is a climate of closure and mistrust.

It is a country that has been colonized and re-colonized, which has fought for independence, which does not give up.

I would like to add a consideration on the flight abroad of young Eritreans. Many of those who claim to be Eritreans are not. They have been encouraged to say this for the advantages recognized to Eritreans. They are young people, who do not ask for asylum in the first country [of arrival], Italy.
The real issue is that excesses of internal repression are described, to then facilitate the entry of Eritreans in Europe.

The description of Eritrea a “North Korea” is born from prejudice. Dictatorial countries are different. In Eritrea there is no cult of personality. There is, instead, a great sense of community.

How does an Italian tourist feel like in Eritrea?

There is no hostility towards Italians. In Eritrea there is a natural predisposition towards others. Historically, geographically and culturally, the different Eritrean ethnic groups have had to learn to live together. Plateau and lowland. The former has an agricultural and rural culture that reflects the Coptic Christian tradition, the same of Ethiopia. The lowlands, on the other hand, have a nomadic culture which corresponds, by and large, to the Islamic religion. In the country these two elements coexist peacefully, indeed they tend to mix.Travelling in Eritrea means to learn very different realities, Asmara, Keren, Massawa.

How is Massawa, a port city on the Red Sea?

Walking through the streets of Massawa, despite the destruction it suffered, still leaves us to imagine the beauty of buildings such as the Bank of Italy. There are small streets lined with buildings constructed of madreporic material. You see Turkish infrastructure, Indian merchant palaces … with an incredible melting pot.

Even here Italians have been careful in the design of buildings. They respected the local tradition, taking into account what already existed.

On July 8th 2017, Asmara became a UNESCO world heritage site …

Asmara is the most fascinating city in all of Africa, with a combination of Western, Arab and Islamic elements.

If the realization of Italian colonialism has become a heritage of humanity, it must be recognized that the Eritreans knew how to preserve its modernity.

Beyond the labels, the buildings of Asmara have incredible charm and beauty. This is a credit to the Eritreans for having understood and valued a heritage that could have been destroyed. As in Addis Ababa, where nothing is left of value, and where the real estate of the Chinese is advancing unstoppable.

The entry of Asmara in the heritage of Humanity will not only be of great importance from the architectural and urban point, but it will represent a milestone in the history of Eritrea.

Cultural heritage always expresses the culture of a community and connotes it. And the need to rebuild the national identity of Eritrea still remains a priority. In fact, since the end of the nineteenth century, the country has been subject to processes of conquest, occupation, militarization, colonization and spoliation, including a cultural one.

If we then abandon any ideological prejudice, we must also say, as Aldo Rossi stated, that the fascist regime made more architecture, and good architecture, too, in the colonies than the last years of republican Italy …

Eritrea has been a true gem of experimentation. Asmara lived under the Italian colonial occupation a period of extraordinary modernization, especially in the Thirties with the communication between the port of Massawa and the capital.

Asmara became a “little Rome” at that point. Extraordinary architects, who could not express their potential at home arrived in Asmara and built over four thousand buildings ranging from Decò to Cubism, from Futurism to Rationalism, both in public and private buildings.

Behind the result achieved by Asmara Unesco heritage there was a huge job. Dozens of engineers, architects, surveyors, the municipality of Asmara, people I have met, all of which are very capable.Now we must also think about Massawa. A city that has been bombed by Ethiopian aviation and still bears the heavy marks of the war.

While travelling in Eritrea what situations did you find outside the capital?

Very different situations between cities and countryside.

The real problem of Eritrea is the aftermath of the long struggle for liberation (ed. 1961-1991). A war that left devastation and deforestation, allowing the desert to advance. Keren had already begun a process of desertification at the end of the nineteenth century, because the peasants would light fires to drive away birds to stop them eating in the dura plantations. So only the baobab trees remained, with their strong bark.

Then deforestation was caused by the need to heat up, therefore breaking down trees. And finally came the war with Ethiopia.

Eritrean salvation, however, was its traditional ability, like the Adulitans and the Axumites, to preserve water.

Let us think of the daily struggle of Eritrean peasants, with little mechanical means and scarse electricity. They fight to get fruits from the land facing the aggression of the desert and drought.

Another point in favor of Eritrea that is useful to know is the defeat of malaria. Health protections have increased and improved. Although there is still much to be done to protect the weaker sections of the population, especially children.

In your book you also talk about Eritrean archeological sites …

Yes, Adulis in particular and the Axumite cities on the Eritrean highland.

Few people know that the development of the Axumite kingdom has been made possible by the very maritime exchanges of the port of Adulis. The port was in fact connected to Axum through caravan routes that went up the Haddas and Komailé courses and, with a difference in height of over 2,000 meters, reached the axumite towns on the Qohaito plateau. From here, the tracks crossed the Ethiopian Tigray passing near the monastery of Debra Damo and Yeha. Finally, arriving in the capital of the Axumite Empire which has been famous, since the ancient world, for its spectacular stelae.

The Ethiopian invasion conducted in this area has caused damage, looting and devastation to both the archaeological and naturalistic heritage. Many monumental sycamore trees were cut down by Ethiopian soldiers for pure contempt. The sycamore tree is in fact sacred and symbolic in all of Eritrea, as for centuries under its foliage public debates have been held, sentences have been issued and the population has gathered.

But violence was not limited to natural elements. They also targeted the archaeological heritage of the Eritrean plateau. Senafe was destroyed and, along with it, the ancient Axumite city of Matara was sacked and ruined, where a precious stele was blown up by placing an explosive at its base.

Many archeological findings looted by Ethiopians are still today in Addis Ababa. The Ethiopians fought to get back the Axum stele from Italy, but so far they have not given Eritrea back what they took from Matara.

Unfortunately, these cities are on the border with Ethiopia, currently militarized, so it is difficult to go there.

I found the description of the arrival in Asmara in your book rather beautiful. From the airport toward the Hamasien hotel …

I arrived in Asmara at night, a misty, dark atmosphere. The city, 2,350 meters above sea level, presented itself with clear sky and stars. Awesome. After the airport, after one or two roundabouts you arrive in front of an airplane-shaped building. At this point you feel as though you were inside a painting by Sironi or De Chirico, in those symbolic outskirts.

It is instead the Fiat Tagliero service station. And you ask yourself how the wings may stay up. As they have done for the past 70 years …

Then you get to the Hamasien hotel, a hotel of the 1920’s with a Tyrolean style dome and the question here is: “where have I ended up?” If it wasn’t for pepper trees it could be Baviera.

The Hamasien is a hotel now almost decrepit, a former CIAAO hotel, (Ed. Italian Hotel Company of Eastern Africa) with 80 rooms and great charm. A particular suggestion.

What can you appreciate and what should you not expect?

If you are looking for the comforts of a 7 star hotel, you are in the wrong place. But the fascination of living in a hotel of colonial architecture, seeing the sky from Lombard style windows … the feeling a building like this can give you … is priceless.

You find yourself in a timeless dimension. Even if then, maybe, there is no hot water …

The Hamasien is also in the district of villas, the old centre of European residences, full of bougainvillae, flowers, palm trees.

Asmara is an enjoyable city, without skyscrapers, where everything has remained people-friendly.
Asmara’s modernity lies in the very absence of skyscrapers, everything is very soft, calm. You can walk by day and by night without any disturbance.

I have visited many cities, but none is like Asmara. Asmara is truly a jewel.

Walking through the center you arrive in its pretty venues, such as Bar Vittoria, where you can drink cappuccino or coffee. It’s incredible. A thousand miles away from home is like being still at home. On the way you can meet the children of old Ascari, people who want to talk in Italian. For the pleasure of communicating, knowing, remembering.

As I said, you feel at home.

I have had many flash backs. I saw again our beautiful Italy of the 1950s. Travelling to Asmara means finding a city, which still has a strong Italian presence: the Casa degli Italiani, the Italian Embassy, the mythical library of the Pavonian Fathers. One of the most important libraries in Africa. A unique library, if you are looking for books about the colonial experience. I did it myself, sitting in this environment of the times gone by, where I had access to books, which in Italy you would find scattered in the most prestigious libraries. a heritage, which deserves to be known and valued.

For this reason I believe that the entry of Asmara to the Unesco Heritage list will bring about an acceleration in development, also culturally. I hope that the Eritreans can manage it because a new colonialism, unfortunately, is always possible.

So Asmara is a “people friendly”, clean, quiet, safe, welcoming city…

Yes, definitely. The Eritreans also have a great sense of dignity and decorum. To understand what Asmara is like, you must use public transport, get on board a bus. The orderly crowd waits in a queue, politely. We have a lot to learn. Starting from nobility.

To end with, without revealing too much about the book, just a hint about the Dahlak Islands. You write “arid, barren, without shade”, then a tourist might ask, why go there?

Going to the Dahlak is a unique experience for those who like wild, true nature.

The Dahlak have nothing to do with Sharm El Sheik, there is no nightlife. But they are wonderful islands for the relation you can have with the sea and with nature.

And yes, you must sleep in a tent, bring water, fish to eat…

It is fascinating to think that each one of these isles, once had its own water tank and that hydroculture was practised. Night humidity and the morning dew were used to produce water for cultivation.

Let’s think about the great climatic changes. In Pantelleria, for example, there is the same dryland farming of the Dahlak Islands. Today it is essential to know these very techniques, resources that will become increasingly necessary. I would add that at Dahlak Kebir, the largest island, there is a wonderful necropolis, a must-see place. The Dahlaks are also a place in the history of our navy.

What do you have to do to visit Eritrea and the Dahlank Islands?

You must apply for a visa in advance and book through a tour operator. For the Dahlak Islands the essential condition is that you love and respect nature and the sea…

Ethiopia 'accepts peace deal' to end Eritrea border occupation

$
0
0
Eritrean troops in 2000



Ethiopia 'accepts peace deal' to end Eritrea border war

By BBCAfrica

Ethiopia says it will fully accept the outcome of a border commission, ending a dispute with Eritrea that sparked Africa's deadliest border war in 1998.

The ruling EPRDF coalition says the decision was taken in an effort to make peace with neighbouring Eritrea.

Tens of thousands of people were killed in two years of fighting.

The two sides have remained on a war footing as Ethiopia refused to accept the ruling of the border commission set up as part of a peace deal in 2000.

The commission said that some disputed areas, including the border town of Badme, were in Eritrea.

As a result, Ethiopia refused to withdrawn its troops out of the disputed areas.

This led Eritrea to accuse Ethiopia of forcefully occupying its territory.

Eritrea has refused to hold any talks with Ethiopia until it agrees unconditionally to the border commission's findings.

Ethiopia's new Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed promised to make peace with the country's northern neighbour after taking power earlier this year.

BBC World Service Africa editor Will Ross says if Ethiopia does now remove soldiers from the disputed land it would show it is serious about seeking peace.

_____________________

By Madote

Reuters correspondent Aaron Maasho says Ethiopia will fully "accept and implement" the EEBC  ruling. This will be huge if implemented, as that would remove the last obstacle to begin dialogue for a lasting peace and the normalization of relations between Eritrea and Ethiopia.








Ethiopia to cede land at heart of bloody conflict with Eritrea

$
0
0
Badme village


Ethiopia to cede land at heart of bloody conflict with Eritrea

By John Aglionby | FT

Ethiopia announced on Tuesday it would implement a peace agreement ending a 1998-2000 war with Eritrea that requires it to cede disputed land it has occupied for almost two decades.

The executive committee of the ruling Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front also said after a day-long meeting that the government would sell off minority stakes in state-owned enterprises, including Ethio Telecom and Ethiopian Airlines, and that foreigners would be allowed to invest in the lucrative businesses.

The moves are part of a radical reform agenda initiated by Abiy Ahmed, who became Ethiopian prime minister in April, to open up the country after 26 years of authoritarian rule by a minority elite. He has also promised greater democracy in a nation where the EPRDF controls every seat in parliament.

In December 2000 Ethiopia and Eritrea signed an agreement in Algiers to end the two-year conflict triggered by competing claims for territory along the border. The fighting cost tens of thousands of lives.

But Addis Ababa refused to recognise the 2002 decision of a boundary commission established under the agreement that gave the town of Badme, which was the flashpoint of the war, and surrounding territory to Eritrea. Ethiopia has occupied the area ever since, insisting relations should be normalised before any resolution of the boundary, and the countries have remained in a state of “no peace no war” ever since.

But on Tuesday Ethiopia said it would “fully implement” the Algiers accord and the decision of the boundary commission.

Ahmed Soliman, an Ethiopia analyst at Chatham House in London, described Ethiopia’s decision as “really significant”.

“Ethiopia has flouted an international peace agreement for 16 years and used its larger size and more sophisticated diplomatic clout to isolate Eritrea regionally and internationally,” he said. “But since Abiy Ahmed has come in he’s talked about wanting to mend ties and reach out to Eritrea.

“This is the first step. We now need to see them actually give up Badme.”

Ethiopia Vows to Give Disputed Badme Town to Eritrea

$
0
0



Ethiopia Vows to Give Disputed Badme Town to Eritrea


By Salem Solomon | VOA

Ethiopia will give a long-disputed swath of land to Eritrea, the government announced Tuesday.

The executive committee of the EPRDF, Ethiopia's ruling coalition, said that it would adhere to the terms of the Algiers Agreement, which resulted in a definitive ruling on the border between Ethiopia and Eritrea. The international community backed the ruling, signed in 2002, and both sides agreed to the U.N. Boundary Commission's terms.

But Ethiopia prevented demarcation of the border, resulting in 16 years of unresolved tension — and occasional open conflict — between the East African neighbors.

The EPRDF said its decision Tuesday came after "reviewing the current Ethio-Eritrea situation" and deciding "to maintain peace between people of the two countries."

The Algiers Agreement, signed in 2000, followed a lengthy and bloody border war between Ethiopia and Eritrea. When the war ended, a boundary commission spent several years delimiting a border between the two countries. Their decision reflected the two countries' respective claims, along with colonial-era maps from the 1900s.

Ethiopia and Eritrea disputed nearly three-fourths of the border defined by the commission, and the town of Badme in the west became a major flash point. The commission awarded it to Eritrea, but Ethiopia refused to cede it and surrounding land.

This wasn't the first time Ethiopia said it had accepted the decision, Lea Brilmayer, a professor of international law at Yale Law School, told VOA by phone. Brilmayer was lead council for Eritrea on the commission and worked on attempts to implement the ruling.

"It's impossible to know what the intent is," she said. "If the statement was made in good faith and they implement it, that would be great."

Eritrea and Ethiopia share a complicated history. Eritrea gained independence from Ethiopia in 1991 after a 30-year war, and it won international recognition in 1993. Before the war for independence, Eritrea had been colonized by Italy and made part of Ethiopia's federation.

The Eritrean government has often cited the border issue and what it calls a state of "no peace, no war" as justification for mandatory, indefinite national service.

The late and great Eritrean ambassador Girma Asmerom debating with
the then Ethiopian Minister for Foreign Affairs Berhane Gebre-Christos
in Addis Ababa, January 27, 2014
In 2013, the late Eritrean Ambassador Girma Asmerom said, "If Ethiopia withdraws its army from occupied sovereign Eritrean territory, including the town of Badme, in the morning, dialogue between the two countries will start in the afternoon."

Adhering to the Algiers Agreement would not be complicated, Brilmayer said. "It's relatively straightforward to withdraw Ethiopian forces," she said, adding, there's "nothing for Eritrea to do" to follow through on the Boundary Commission's ruling.

Brilmayer said the move is an important step. "Countries need to know they can count on one another to compile with the obligations they've assumed," she said.



Steps towards peace - Ethiopia has accepted ruling on its border with Eritrea [Video]

$
0
0




Ethiopia to withdraw from disputed border region


By Argaw Ashine | The East African

Ethiopia on Tuesday announced a withdrawal from Badme, whose ownership caused a bloody war with neighbouring Eritrea, sources said.

The decision was made at the executive council meeting of the ruling party Ethiopian People Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) which started on Tuesday in Addis Ababa.

Badme is a small rural area that became a flashpoint culminating in a border war in 1998.

EPRDF, which controls parliament 100 per cent, agreed to implement the Algiers agreement signed in 2000 after the end of two years border war, that claimed estimated over 70,000 lives.

The peace

More than 150,000 soldiers have been deployed for the last 18 years across the border between Ethiopia and Eritrea.

Ethiopian had, for the last 18 years, refused to implement the Algiers agreement after the international court awarded the disputed Badme to Eritrea.

EPRDF also extended the peace and normalisation of relations call to the Eritrean government.



Music: the essential building block of our Eritrean identity

$
0
0
EriAM sisters 



Music: the essential building block of our national identity

By Simon Weldemichael | Eritrea Profile

History has shown that music profoundly shapes the goals and objectives of people, moving towards collective identity, cultural nationalism, and political independence. Music also transmits ideologies and political demands to adherents and activists of political, cultural, and social movements. Eritrean nationalism emerged in many ways, but music played a vital role in furnishing emotion and ideological cohesion, and fueled the excitement and sustainability of nationalist identification, leading up to and following independence. The Eritrean struggle for independence and the emergence of uniquely Eritrean revolutionary songs are inseparably linked and illustrate how cultural forms, like music, are important forces in shaping a collective national consciousness and in establishing a democratic political organization that leads the struggle successfully.

The secular nature of Eritrean nationalism is based on an African and, more specifically, Eritrean ideology. It is rooted in common history and culture. Music was a common identity platform, which influenced the sense of community for Eritreans. Music represented a form through which Eritreans expressed their satisfaction and disappointment with the practices happening in Eritrea and also reflected the regional and global practices.

In the past, prominent artists of the federal period and revolutionary singers evoked in Eritreans an awareness of their socio-economic and political realities, cultural traditions, and prospects for the future. The timely message carried in appropriate lyrics and melody has been absorbed by the people to empower and energize the mass and to create a common understanding across the society. The tune and flavor of our cultural and spiritual music and our traditional instruments indicates that music is part of life for Eritreans.

Music maximizes its ability to foster social cohesion and national identity if its meaning fits with the ideology and general condition of the moment. The effectiveness of music is measured by the degree of congruency between the message and the aspiration of the people. Music must externalize and visualize the desires, hopes, dreams, worries and complaints of the population. The artists of the federal period and the subsequent period following annexation, including Dr. Bereket Mengesteab, Ateweberhan Segid, Alamin Abdelletif, Tewelde Reda, Tebrih Tesfahuney, conveyed their nationalist sentiments with high subtlety to disguise from the repressive Ethiopian colonial administration. The resentment against the Ethiopian empire was found in the lyrics and popular songs. In this connection Ruth Eyob, in her book ‘the Eritrean struggle for independence 1941_1991’, has described the general mood of the time in the following words: “although the shows were censored by the authorities the artists camouflaged the political message in the intricacies of traditional ballads. In the cultural arena, both the new and old traditional nationalists were united in their desire to combat Ethiopian hegemony” (Ruth 1995, 103). The power exerted by the popular songs of the 1960s, like Shigey habuni (give me my torch) and aslamay kstanay (Muslim and Christian), in their call for independence and unity was incalculable.

Saed Berhanu 
Revolutionary artists, standing on the foundation laid by their predecessors and powered by the revolutionary sentiments, publicized further the internal desire of the people for independence. Their music tightened the national cohesion and consolidated Eritrean nationalism to its highest peak. One foreign observer described Eritrean revolutionary songs as something that “serve more than bullets”. We have not only defeated our many and mighty enemies by the sheer power of bullets. The position of our enemies was equally trembled by the sound of the music that echoed the justness of our struggle. Similarly, Eritrean nationalism and Eritrean national identity are not only crafted by war and the military victory gained out of it. The mental effect of our revolutionary songs in the consolidation of the sociopsychological conditions of Eritreans was principal. Through the use of nationalist lyrics and feverish beats, revolutionary songs increased public awareness and mobilization. They were inspirational, demonstrative, educative and penetrative. They boosted the morale of the fighters and the people and, at the same time, ruined the moral of the enemy. The songs of all the martyred and alive tegadelti continued to be a symbol of artistic beauty and national story to this day. They fit the overriding ideology of the moment and also represent the unchanging belief of Eritreans for all the times to come. Our revolutionary songs were clear, straight and to the point.

During the 30-year long struggle for independence music and other forms of culture made equal contribution as the political and military wings in terms of mobilizing and impacting the people of Eritrea and introducing the revolution to wider international audience. This tradition of supporting the socio-economic and political conditions of the country with cultural activities more importantly music, continued well in post-independence Eritrea. The music that helped Eritrea to achieve independence was transformed to the preservation of independence invasion and the implementation of the ongoing national development drive. For instance the songs of Teckle Kiflemeriam (wedi tkul) like “sawa” and “gobez teshamo” in the 1990s played a great role in reinvigorating and transferring Eritrean nationalism and patriotism to the new generation.

The national music of post-independence instilled a sense of importance, strength, and pride among the new generation in Eritrea, while indicating the challenges of maintaining independence and building a prosperous country.

Tesfay Mehari aka Fihira -
Credit: YPFDJ Media
Music is meant for the people. It is a powerful tool for externalizing the people’s collective emotion. Music must be an active and living force and be made compellingly relevant to the environment in which it exists. More importantly, music must represent the society and must serve the common good of the people. Artists are the invisible leaders of the society. Therefore our artists should continue to act as leaders of the present and future generations.

National identity comprises both a political and a cultural one. Music is an effective tool that can influence the socio- psychological status of the people and reinvigorate nationalism. Nationalism and national identity are to a great extent forged and maintained by music. The closer we get to Eritrea’s national songs, the easier it is to see that the issue of identity is directly related to music. Without the subtle resistance and revolutionary music, neither the Eritrean revolution nor the Eritrean national identity would ever have been established. The role of post-independence national music in the defense and development campaign has been extraordinary. Without the post-independence national music we would not have found a way of surviving and prospering. Music is not only part of the Eritrean culture but also is a transmitter and symbol of our national identity.

The national charter of Eritrea stipulated that “We must tirelessly strive to make Eritrea a country where culture can flourish. Art, including music, literature and visual art, should freely develop, assuming a national character ...” Therefore all creative nationals must strive to develop and promote Eritrean culture by preserving and enhancing the traditional and revolutionary cultural heritage. Music is an essential building block of our national identity and an instrument of nation building. Let thousands of albums be produced that describe Eritrean independence, self-reliance, patriotism, gender equality, and that commemorate our martyrs. Eritrean artists must refrain from blowing whichever way the wind blows and must persist in producing harmonizing, uniting and inspiring music as ever.


How genuine is Ethiopia's peace offer to Eritrea?

$
0
0
Soldiers from Eritrea march past a child to fight in 2000 (Credit: Picture-alliance/dpa/S Forrest)


Ethiopia offers Eritrea chance to end Africa's longest war


By BBC

Ethiopia's surprise announcement that it will abide by a 2002 border ruling raises the prospect of a final end to what was Africa's deadliest border war and peace with its long-time rival, Eritrea.

Tens of thousands of people were killed in the two-year conflict and Eritrea remains on a war footing, demanding that Ethiopia withdraws from the "occupied territory".

How genuine is this peace offer?

It seems pretty genuine.

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed signalled in his inauguration speech in April that a major policy shift could be in the offing - he called on Eritrea to resolve their differences, saying the two neighbours were "not only intertwined in interests but also in blood".

Now, the ruling Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) has announced it will fully accept and implement the peace deal that ended the war.

Mr Abiy said soldiers deployed to the contested town of Badme had experienced "psychological effects", according to the state-linked Fana Broadcasting Corporate.

"We should end this suffering, and fully return to peace," the prime minister is quoted as saying.

Ethiopia's previous leaders always said they accepted the 2002 ruling but they never actually implemented it.

Mr Abiy's announcement is especially significant as it comes after the release of thousands of jailed politicians, activists and protesters, including British citizen Andargachew Tsege who was being held on death row, and the promise of wider reforms.

What does Eritrea say?

Eritrea has not commented on Ethiopia's announcement but Information Minister Yemane Gebre Meskel had previously told the BBC that relations could not be resolved until Ethiopia withdrew "from the occupied territories".

"The ball is now in Eritrea's court," Tesfalem Araia from the BBC's Tigrinya service says.

"Eritrea has been on a war footing and the justification for forced conscription into the army has been the conflict with Ethiopia," he adds.

That forced conscription is the reason given by most of the thousands of Eritreans who flee the country, making the perilous journey to Europe.


Ethiopia's PM says ending war, expanding economic links with Eritrea key for regional stability

$
0
0
Ethiopian Prime Minister, Dr. Abiy Ahmed 



Ethiopia's PM says ending war, expanding economic links with Eritrea key for regional stability


By Aaron Masaho | Reuters

Ethiopia’s prime minister said on Wednesday that ending war and expanding economic ties with neighboring Eritrea is critical for stability and development in the impoverished Horn of Africa region.

Abiy Ahmed’s remarks followed the announcement on Tuesday by his ruling coalition that Ethiopia would fully implement a peace deal signed in 2000 and meant to end a two-year war that devolved into a stalemate resulting in huge military build up by both countries.

The pledge would entail ceding a disputed town to Eritrea. There was no sign on Wednesday that Ethiopia had begun withdrawing its troops from the town of Badme.

It is one of many policy shifts announced since the 41-year-old took office in early April, moves that could reshape Ethiopia’s relations with its neighbors and have equally dramatic impacts inside the country of 100 million people.

Whether the new measures, including liberalization of the state-controlled economy, end up addressing critical challenges from high youth unemployment to rising government debt remain to be seen. But they are shaking the country up.

“All that we have achieved from the situation of the last 20 years is tension,” Abiy said.

“Neither Ethiopia nor Eritrea benefit from a stalemate. We need to expend all our efforts toward peace and reconciliation and extricate ourselves from petty conflicts and divisions and focus on eliminating poverty.”

Ethiopia’s move is a “drastic departure” from its longstanding – and failed – policy, said Ahmed Soliman, Ethiopia analyst at Chatham House, a London-based thinktank.

“To see some movement is extremely positive. This is the most important latent conflict within the Horn and its resolution is important for peace and security in the region.”

NO COMMENT FROM ERITREA

Eritrea used to be a part of Ethiopia and waged a 30-year struggle for independence. The war on their shared border between 1998 and 2000 killed tens of thousands of people, caused significant displacement and the splintering of families.

Eritrea’s government has not responded publicly to Addis Ababa’s offer of an olive branch late on Tuesday. The two nations cut ties during the war.

Asmara’s Information Minister told Reuters on Tuesday evening he had not seen the Ethiopian government’s statement so could not immediately comment. He did not respond to phone calls on Wednesday.

Eritrea has long said it wants Ethiopia to pull its troops out from the disputed territory before normalizing ties, citing a decision by a boundary commission at The Hague which awarded the village of Badme to Eritrea in 2002.

Asmara has long felt betrayed by world powers, who they say failed to force Ethiopia to abide by the commission ruling.

Ethiopia says the row over border demarcation can only be resolved through a negotiated settlement.

On Tuesday, an Ethiopian foreign ministry official told Reuters that there were “at least 61 attempts” to mediate between the two nations, but that Asmara had rejected all requests.

Russia, the European Union, and Qatar were among those that proposed to mediate in the last two decades, he said.

Abiy said Ethiopia needed to resolve what he seemed to view as a costly and pointless dispute.

“Putting an end to this situation and finding peace is necessary beyond anything else not just for Ethiopia but for the wider Horn of Africa,” he said in a speech in Addis Ababa.

“Every Ethiopian should realize that it is expected of us to be a responsible government that ensures stability in our region, one that takes the initiative to connect the brotherly peoples of both countries and expands trains, buses and economic ties between Asmara and Addis Ababa.”

Diplomats say punitive measures taken against Eritrea may prevent an immediate conclusion to the dispute.

The U.N. Security Council imposed an arms embargo on Eritrea in 2009 on charges that Asmara provided political, financial and logistical support to militant groups in Somalia. Eritrea has long dismissed the claims, saying they are concocted by Addis Ababa in a bid to isolate the country and divert attention from Ethiopia’s reluctance to hand over the disputed areas.

“The Eritrean government has always proclaimed its innocence and will demand that the sanctions are promptly lifted. This could be a sticking point for now,” said a Western diplomat in Ethiopia.



Eritrean Cycle Festival in UK 2018

$
0
0
Eritrea is the Powerhouse of the Continent - 8x Champion of Africa!


ERITREAN CYCLE FESTIVAL 16-17 JUNE 2018

Great day for Eritrea & Africa!

With the two-day long 1st Eritrean Cycle Festival in Manchester UK, will be sensational month for Eritreans.

It is historic and lively because of the several sports personalities who are taking part such as the “fathers of cycling”, Tekeste Weldu, aka “Gegante”, Salambini, Wedi Arbate, Biniam Berhe, Dawit Mesfun, Halebay, Mekseb Debesay and many more, who participated in international cycling tournaments including the Olympic Games.

For more information visit our website:-

http://www.eritreacyclefestival.com
http://www.tanganger.co.uk

Eritrea EmbassyMedia




Ethiopia: PM appoints chief of staff and chief of intelligence

$
0
0
 General Seare Mekonen is the new Chief of Staff of ENDF


Ethiopia: PM appoints chief of staff and chief of intelligence

By ESAT

Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed today appointed General Seare Mekonen as the new Chief of Staff of the National Defense Forces of Ethiopia replacing General Samora Yunis.

The Prime Minister also appointed general Adem Mohammed as Chief of the national Intelligence and Security Agency.

Fitsum Arega, Chief of Staff at the Prime Minister Office said in a tweet that the appointment of General Seare Mekonnen is effective today.

A former deputy chief of staff of the army, General Adem Mohammed’s appointment as chief of intelligence is also effective today

Meanwhile, the Premier today restored stars & full ranks to Major General Alemeshet Degfe and Brigadier General Asaminew Tsige.

The regime stripped of the ranks of the two Generals after they had held a position that the regime had to respect the vote of the people following the controversial 2005 election. The Generals had also demanded at the time that the army should not involve in politics.

Fitsum Arega said in a tweet that “The two Generals were stripped of their stars & ranks in the past but will now retire with their full pension,”



Eritrean graduate pays homage to immigrants, teaches graduating class a little Tigrinya [Video]

$
0
0



Congratulation, Abel!

The Tigrinya part starts at 14:42 into the video


Eritrean graduate pays homage to immigrants in graduation speech

By Abel

Given the privilege to speak at my graduation, I took no time in addressing my parents journey in coming to America, the importance of immigrants, and the opportunities we have living in America. Enjoy.


Landlocked Ethiopia May Establish Naval Base at Kenyan Port

$
0
0
Lamu port in Kenya


Landlocked Ethiopia May Establish Naval Base at Kenyan Port


By Nizar Manek and David Herbling | Bloomberg

Ethiopia, landlocked since the secession of Eritrea a quarter century ago, may consider building a naval base in neighboring Kenya to strengthen its military capabilities, the head of the state shipping company said.

The facility could form part of a port the Kenyan government is building at Lamu, said Roba Megerssa Akawak, chief executive officer of the state-owned Ethiopian Shipping & Logistics Services Enterprise. The 390 billion-shilling ($3.87 billion) harbor near the border with Somalia is part of the so-called Lapsset project, a transport corridor that envisions linking Ethiopia and South Sudan to Kenya.

Information Minister Ahmed Shide said he was unaware of any discussions between the two countries, Ethiopia’s interest in Lamu is mainly economic and that Roba isn’t in a position to have knowledge about talks with Kenya’s government. Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s call last month for the establishment of a naval force was “a future possibility,” the information minister said. “We can only give information when we know the future plan.”

Abiy secured an agreement with Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta last month to develop land at Lamu for “logistical facilitation.” The country relies on Djibouti and Sudan for access to the sea.

Somaliland Port


Last year, Ethiopia agreed to take a share in a joint venture with DP World Ltd. to administer a port at Berbera, in the semi-autonomous region of Somaliland in northern Somalia, which will host a United Arab Emirates military airport and a naval base.

“Countries cooperate in naval activities and Ethiopia should really consider this,” Roba said in an interview in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa Wednesday. “The decision by the government to have naval interests in cooperation with other countries or of its own is very important and crucial and timely.”

A navy would be useful not only in protecting ESLSE’s fleet of 11 civilian vessels, which sail to the Indian subcontinent, the Far East and the Black Sea, but in protecting the “very volatile” Red Sea area where Ethiopia has other economic interests “and there are conflicting political interests,” Roba said.

Neighboring Djibouti, through which 90 percent of Ethiopia’s inbound trade is channeled, may be unsuitable for an Ethiopian naval facility because it already hosts facilities for global powers including the largest U.S. military base in Africa and the first such overseas post for China’s armed forces, Roba said.

‘Efficient’ Location

Djibouti is “controlled by naval forces that surround the area,” he said. “We are afraid perhaps in the future that even Djibouti may not have its own say to really decide on its own fate. This is quite a threat to Ethiopia.”

Roba considers Lamu “an efficient” location to host an Ethiopian base. “The distance from inland Ethiopia will be countered by other benefits,” he said, without elaborating.

Ethiopia disbanded its navy in 1996, three years after Eritrea gained independence after a three-decade war. The secession deprived Ethiopia of 2,234 kilometers (1,388 miles) of coastline. In 2015, the government adopted a logistics strategy to use multiple ports in the region to improve its external trade.

Kenyan Transport Principal Secretary Paul Maringa said he wasn’t able to comment because he doesn’t have details of the discussions with the Ethiopian government.


Ethiopia must abide by the EEBC and move on: TPLF supporter

$
0
0




LET THE TRUTH BE TOLD AS IS: A TRIBUTE TO MY BIRTH PLACE ADI HAKI-MEKELE.

By Liberty Sam

I read many of the comments given on Tigrai Online with regard to the recent EPRDF executive council declaration on the Algers agreement and EEBC decision. It is funny that some people do not understand what a law and agreement means. Even though we do not agree with the Ethiopian Government decision to go to court after the war, we agreed the border to be demarcated through colonial treaties. We agreed the verdict to be final and binding. Ethiopia, the seat of the African union, trying to fight against an agreement it signed on is a precursor for a great damage in our image. We will be a country which is not trust worthy. Moreover, if we cannot respect International law at home, how are we going to protect International law by sending thousands of Ethiopian Peace keepers throughout Africa?

If Badme were given to Ethiopia, and Eritrea did the things we are doing now, what would have we done? The answer is we would have ignited another full fledged war. Right after the verdict is announced, didn’t Ambassador Siyum Mesfin ask the Eritrean government to abide by the verdict? Didn’t we dance in the streets of Addis Ababa because we thought we were given Badme and others places that we did not ask for? There is no peace by sidelining the rule of law. Because true justice is affirmed only through the court of law.

As if it was new to Ethiopia only, I have heard the people of Irob saying if the border is demarcated the Irob people will be divided into two. Not going far away, don’t we know that the Ethiopian people of Afar, Kunama, and Tigrina are also found in Eritrea. Don’t we know that the people of Tigre, Rashida and Hidareb, are found in both Eritrea and Sudan. Don’t we know that the people of Afar, Issa are found in Ethiopia and Djibouti. Don’t we know the Somalis and Oromo are found in Ethiopia, Kenya and Somalia? If this is the realty of Africa, why are the people of Irob raising the issue as unique to them? In fact, if it is handled appropriately, the stretching of an ethnic groups along the two countries can be used as a bridge. This is common in Europe, North America, Asia and South America.

The issue of Badme is easier than the Issue of Irob. Although the administration was under Tigrai, most of the dwellers of Badme were Eritreans. Do you know that before the war 85% of the dwellers of Badme were Eritreans? Excluding the new settlers, because they are connected to the military, I am sure the original Eritrean and Tigrean dwellers of Badme can live together in peace side by side regardless of the demarcation.

Although demarcation is not the easiest way to make peace between the two people, there is no any other choice. Ethiopia had two choices. Not to go to the court or abide by the court verdict. We went to the court and the second step is to abide by the verdict and move on.

I know some people may not be happy by my argument. However, there will not be peace by hiding the truth. Because we have the winning Army, we cannot break International law. Our Army is in there to be guided by domestic and international law. Playing by emotions is not going to be a solution to the problem.

Peace building takes time and many sacrifices. For many people to blame the EPRDF for its decision is naïve. Do you think 36 smart people passed the decision without considering all the issues we are talking about here? If we had any other solution, why have we been in the destructing no war not peace situation for the last 16 years? Who do you think the international community faults for the stalemate?

It is time to put the down payment for lasting peace one at a time.


Is this apparent change of course by Ethiopia for real?

$
0
0
Ethiopian PM Abiy Ahmed must walk the talk by ordering his troops to leave occupied Eritrean territories to start a new era of peace.  Photo Credit: AFP | Zacharias Abueker



Is this apparent change of course by Ethiopia for real?

By Tecle Abraham
08.06.2018

For 16 years peace was held hostage to the Woyane`s confused pipedream of Gretear Tigrai. Now, following the wind of change blowing in Ethiopia, it seems a breakthrough is appearing, with the newly promoted PM of Ethiopia assuming the pinnacle of power once the domain of the Woyane. The unequivocal announcement of Dr. Abiy that Ethiopia is finally ready to respect and implement the EEBC decision fully is an apparent reversal of the long held policy of Woyanes Dialogue. If that is so, then although he didn't use the delimitation and demarcation words, we have to assume that he meant so, otherwise there is no meaning of the full acceptance of the decision. Furthermore he implied accepting the dissociation of Dialogue from the implementation of the EEBC ruling. After all the treachery, prevarication und deceit of the Woyane regime, we Eritreans though can only believe him, when he walks the talk and withdraw his troops and administration from our sovereign territories. Notwithstanding our understandable suspicion though, there are compelling reasons why the Ethiopians should implement it for their own self-interest.

The apparent change of Policy after 16 years is by no means something that deserves commendation from the Eritreans side, but it shows the dramatic difference between the Eritreans and Ethiopians or rather Woyanes with respect of cultural values. We Eritreans cherish the truth and we fight for it to the bitter end. That is what we demonstrated when we fought for 30 years, in spite of the overwhelming odds against us. The same is true about what we did to defend our independence and sovereignty, when Woyane invaded us in 1998-2000. That is what we demonstrated by foiling the intention of the most vicious enemy Woyane in the past 18 years. Truth and justice are our proudest values and it is no by accident that Truth is in our national Anthem, making us probably the only one in the world to have it. Then if we have to go the court, we Eritreans adhere and accept the ruling of a Court. That is what we demonstrated by accepting without if and buts, the unfavourable ruling of the court decision regarding our dispute with yemen over of Hanish kebir and sequir isalnd. We didn't need to take years to accept the ruling like Ethiopia did.

We Eritreans know why the Woyane government took 2 decades to finally accept the ruling without if and buts. Following the EEBC decision, we Eritreans accepted the ruling in its entirety and hoped the Woyanes would do the same. But it proved false. Because the pipe dream of greater Tigrai has been alive and kicking, instead of accepting their futility of their dream, they chose to keep trying using another form of war. With the unreserved support western imperialist powers, they did employ every dirty machiavellian trick to realise their dream of subjugating and crushing Eritrea. They managed to frame us and impose sanctions including arms embargo, carried out incessant psychological warfare to undermine our unity, our pride, our patriotism; used every jihadist and spent force sell out to threaten our peace and security, employed every known economic sabotage to undermine our economy, even they transported abroad their poverty stricken Tegaru in the name of Eritrean refugees but to no avail. Rather on the contrary Eritrea managed as usual with its legendary steadfastness to cope with its challenges and is marching from strength to strength. That is the reality Woyane has to grapple with. Woyane is really like the frog from Ezops fable that dreamed being as big as a Bull only to explode and disappear. That is why Eriteans have every reason to congratulate themselves for forcing this monstrous Woyane to face the reality after 2 decades. Mind you after two decades !

Although Dr. Abiy is the PM who officially confirmed the change of policy, the looming change was also in the offing during the reign of his predecessor Desalegn. As a matter fact, the previous PM was so desperate to go to Asmara apparently seeking peace, that he was literally begging it. As it was later made clear from his Mo foundation appearance, they have tried every trick of diplomacy to lure Eritrea into dialogue. This cannot happen to a powerful country that dreams of the role of regional power and confident of itself. The explanation is one and clear: the establishment was deeply worried not only that their destabilizing policy has failed completely, but also that their regime is bracing for a threat emanating from the very heart of Woyaneland ( see the latest TPDM Video). In one of my previous articles, I tried to analyse his options and it was clear that they would do something along the idea suggested by Dr. Abiy, as they are deeply worried about their regime. I can`t imagine what their unqualified Think Tank experts like the geriatric aboy Sbhat and Abay Tsehaye had recommended, but I know what their qualified experts may have recommended. The prominent self-nominated Woyane expert on Ethio-Eritrean affairs is assistant professor Medhane Tadesse. In his recent appearance with EBC on this issue, he justified the policy change and argued that would enable Ethiopia to remove the security threat coming from Eritrea. Neither he nor the others would like to specify the security threats from Eritrea, but they can`t help revealing their concern about the regimes survival.

Dr. Abiy is taking every opportunity to talk about the need of new era of peace between Eritrea and Ethiopia. Speaking on the opening of a conference to do with corruption, after telling the audience about the three policy options regarding Eritrea, he explained why the previous policy of no war – no peace had no dividend except tension. On the other hand he pointed out the dividends of peace in terms of economic and social activities between the two countries. Bearing in mind the grave political, economic, social and security conditions the country finds itself, peace with Eritrea would be helpful to relieve their precarious situation. Therefore, the reason behind this apparent change of policy being pure admission of this untenable situation, I would like to believe the PM means business, when he pronounced his full acceptance of the EEBC decision in its entirety. It seems the Woyanes are also in the bandwagon and probably are the initiators of the change. So, it is no wonder that they are trying to sell it to their people in a positive light. But, as always they can`t help with their double-tongue. Their official party press statement and Getachew Reda suggests of something like Dialogue. It is a thus certainty that the Woyanes will do their utmost to tamper with the independent implementation of the demarcation. However, with the increasing vigour the PM is assuming with his constitutional authority, the Woyanes would not be able to defy his decision on withdrawing its troops and citizens from sovereign Eritrean territories. That is what they must to do, if peace is indeed their goal.


Viewing all 4577 articles
Browse latest View live